2014
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0266-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct parietal sites mediate the influences of mood, arousal, and their interaction on human recognition memory

Abstract: The two dimensions of emotion, mood valence and arousal, have independent effects on recognition memory. At present, however, it is not clear how those effects are reflected in the human brain. Previous research in this area has generally dealt with memory for emotionally valenced or arousing stimuli but the manner in which interacting mood and arousal states modulate responses in memory substrates remains poorly understood. We investigated

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, neural responses in a more posterior part of the hippocampus might indicate the encoding of emotionally negative memories (Shafer & Dolcos, 2012), whereas the anterior cluster might process gist-like associations between a threat (painful stimulation) and its context (Poppenk et al, 2013). Our PPI analyses show significant connections of the more posterior part of the hippocampus with the posterior cingulate cortex/ thalamus and precuneus (BA 7a), regions that have been shown to display increased responses in a recognition memory task under conditions of high arousal (Greene, Flannery, & Soto, 2014). Moreover, the functional connections between both hippocampal clusters might involve the integration of their respective computations while the correlation of the aHPC and amygdala possibly reflects the projection of the contextual representation to the amygdala to generate a fear response (although the PPI method does not permit directional statements).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Particularly, neural responses in a more posterior part of the hippocampus might indicate the encoding of emotionally negative memories (Shafer & Dolcos, 2012), whereas the anterior cluster might process gist-like associations between a threat (painful stimulation) and its context (Poppenk et al, 2013). Our PPI analyses show significant connections of the more posterior part of the hippocampus with the posterior cingulate cortex/ thalamus and precuneus (BA 7a), regions that have been shown to display increased responses in a recognition memory task under conditions of high arousal (Greene, Flannery, & Soto, 2014). Moreover, the functional connections between both hippocampal clusters might involve the integration of their respective computations while the correlation of the aHPC and amygdala possibly reflects the projection of the contextual representation to the amygdala to generate a fear response (although the PPI method does not permit directional statements).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…1 Rendering of the three interiors that were used as stimuli, counterbalanced across subjects. Each subject was placed in the middle of the room during the experiment Finally, the activity in parietal sites related to pleasantness could reflect the participation in perception of goal-directed hand actions (Salmi et al 2014) as well as a manifestation of positive moods (Greene et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly because 1st) the Cz electrode site is positioned right over the central portion of the precentral gyrus; an area that is primarily responsible for the control of lower limbs (Jain et al, 2013), and 2nd) fronto‐parietal connectivity is generally associated with goal‐directed attention and sensorimotor representations guiding body‐environment interactions (Spadone et al, 2021). In addition, several areas of the parietal cortex are implicated with sensory processing, behavioral control, and arousal regulation (e.g., Acevedo et al, 2014; Greene et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%