2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00226-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct temporal activity patterns in the rat M1 and red nucleus during skilled versus unskilled limb movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
44
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
44
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This window was defined the period from 50 ms before the videocoded Final Sniff time to 50 ms afterward, as determined by several factors: (1) prior results showing unit modulation during that task phase in that time window, (2) the correspondence between a sniff, in general, and the length of one theta cycle (Kepecs et al 2006), and (3) Monte Carlo simulations to find a window in which oscillations for the two trial types (GO and NO-GO) were maximally distinguished. This period also correlated well with our prior finding that unit firing rate modulation tended to occur within a ~100 ms window (Hermer-Vazquez et al 2004). We then systematically checked autocorrelograms at binwidths of 2, 5, 10, and 25 ms to determine the proportion of cells in each area for each rat that were oscillating above a 99% confidence level (above the background firing rate and assuming a Poisson distribution to calculate the window boundaries) in the beta, low gamma or high gamma band during the 100 ms Sniff-GO window versus the Sniff-NO-GO window.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This window was defined the period from 50 ms before the videocoded Final Sniff time to 50 ms afterward, as determined by several factors: (1) prior results showing unit modulation during that task phase in that time window, (2) the correspondence between a sniff, in general, and the length of one theta cycle (Kepecs et al 2006), and (3) Monte Carlo simulations to find a window in which oscillations for the two trial types (GO and NO-GO) were maximally distinguished. This period also correlated well with our prior finding that unit firing rate modulation tended to occur within a ~100 ms window (Hermer-Vazquez et al 2004). We then systematically checked autocorrelograms at binwidths of 2, 5, 10, and 25 ms to determine the proportion of cells in each area for each rat that were oscillating above a 99% confidence level (above the background firing rate and assuming a Poisson distribution to calculate the window boundaries) in the beta, low gamma or high gamma band during the 100 ms Sniff-GO window versus the Sniff-NO-GO window.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In previous work, we showed that the firing rates of large percentages of multi-single units in the rat motor cortex and red nucleus were significantly modulated on at least five videocoded task phases (Fig. 1b;Hermer-Vazquez et al 2004). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Vestibular signals participate in regulating hindlimb blood flow (20,22,41), and thus the infected neurons in the lateral vestibular nucleus likely are components of the neural pathway that mediates this response. The red nucleus is not typically considered to participate in autonomic regulation but instead plays a fundamental role in motor control in the rat (13,24). Red nucleus neurons could potentially contribute to altering limb blood flow in parallel with movement and thus may comprise elements in the neural circuit underlying central command (39).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%