2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinctive Order Based Self-Similarity descriptor for multi-sensor remote sensing image matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with the findings of previous research conducted by Long et al and Sedaghat et al, which proposed outlier removal to increase the accuracy of SIFT-based GCPs. However, our research proposed an iterative process for outlier removal which evaluates the GCP after performing a complete RPC refinement process, thus taking the topographic effects into account by use of DEM [25,26]. Additionally, the proposed outlier removal strategy is simpler than the one conducted in Sedaghat et al, which used combinations of contrast matching, curvature analysis and entropy calculation [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are consistent with the findings of previous research conducted by Long et al and Sedaghat et al, which proposed outlier removal to increase the accuracy of SIFT-based GCPs. However, our research proposed an iterative process for outlier removal which evaluates the GCP after performing a complete RPC refinement process, thus taking the topographic effects into account by use of DEM [25,26]. Additionally, the proposed outlier removal strategy is simpler than the one conducted in Sedaghat et al, which used combinations of contrast matching, curvature analysis and entropy calculation [25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our research proposed an iterative process for outlier removal which evaluates the GCP after performing a complete RPC refinement process, thus taking the topographic effects into account by use of DEM [25,26]. Additionally, the proposed outlier removal strategy is simpler than the one conducted in Sedaghat et al, which used combinations of contrast matching, curvature analysis and entropy calculation [25]. Moreover, our evaluation related to surface topography and LC characteristics meant that the accuracy and the number of GCPs produced by SIFT was not affected by topographic variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a premise operation of feature extraction, the input image will be smoothened in the scale space. After that, one or several features of the image will be calculated through local derivative operation (Amin and Hamid, 2015;Gholam and Davar, 2015).…”
Section: Image Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the standard SIFT operator is applied to multi-source optical satellite image matching, the number of matched feature points is limited; a large percentage of mismatches occur and the correctly matched points are not uniformly distributed, resulting in match failure. To improve the performance of SIFT, researchers have reformed it mainly by: (1) improving the feature extraction operator [15][16][17][18]; (2) improving the feature descriptor [19][20][21]; and (3) improving the matching strategy [22][23][24][25][26]. For example, to improve the feature extraction ability in textureless areas, Sedaggat et al [17] proposed the uniform robust SIFT (UR-SIFT) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%