2003
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2003.v10.n6.a12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguished representations for $SL(2)$

Abstract: Abstract. Let E/F be a quadratic extension of p-adic fields. We compute the multiplicity of the space of SL 2 (F )-invariant linear forms on a representation of SL 2 (E). This multiplicity varies inside an L-packet similar in spirit to the multiplicity formula for automorphic representations due to Labesse and Langlands.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The map φ τ → φ τ | W DE is called the base change map. Prasad's conjecture for SL(2) predicts the following result, which was shown in [AP03].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The map φ τ → φ τ | W DE is called the base change map. Prasad's conjecture for SL(2) predicts the following result, which was shown in [AP03].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…From these theorems due to Labesse-Langlands [LL79], and the theorems due to the authors in [AP03], [AP06] we deduce the following:…”
Section: G/hmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our work in the previous two sections for the pair (SL 2 (E), SL 2 (F )) was a consequence of this characterization of distinction for GL 2 (E) representations in terms of Asai Lfunction, and an input on distinction for the pair (SL 2 (E), SL 2 (F )) in terms of Whittaker model with respect to a character of E trivial on F which was proved in [AP03] in the local case, and [AP06] in the global case.…”
Section: A More General Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 3.4. For the SL 2 (F )-distinction problem, the set of the multiplicities in the L-packet Π φτ is {4, 0, 0, 0} in this case, see [AP03,Lu18].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 99%