Within due diligence concepts for raw material supply chains, the traceability of a shipment is a major aspect that has to be taken into account. Cassiterite and coltan are two so-called conflict minerals for which traceability systems have been established. To provide additional credibility to document-based traceability systems the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources (BGR) has developed the analytical fingerprint (AFP) for the minerals coltan, cassiterite, and wolframite. AFP is based on the analysis of a sample from a shipment with a declared origin and evaluates whether the declared origin is plausible or not. This is done by comparison to reference samples previously taken at the declared mine site. In addition to the generation of the analytical data, the data evaluation step, with the aim to state whether the declared origin is plausible or not, is of special importance. Two data evaluation approaches named “Kolmogorov–Smirnov distance (KS-D) approach” and “areas ratio approach” are applied to coltan and cassiterite and result in very low rates of false negative results, which is desired for AFP. The areas ratio approach based on hypothesis testing and a more sophisticated evaluation of the multivariate data structure has some advantages in terms of producing lower rates of false positive results compared to the KS-D approach.