2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing relative specialist and generalist species in the fossil record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of consumers was reasonably similar in all three networks, while the ratio of phototrophs increased (from 5.0 to 10.6%) during the primary succession of tailings. Generalist species have wider fundamental niches than specialist species, leading to the strong competitiveness of generalists . The largest generalists of phototrophic protists were observed in MS followed by BC and BL (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The percentage of consumers was reasonably similar in all three networks, while the ratio of phototrophs increased (from 5.0 to 10.6%) during the primary succession of tailings. Generalist species have wider fundamental niches than specialist species, leading to the strong competitiveness of generalists . The largest generalists of phototrophic protists were observed in MS followed by BC and BL (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To understand the ecological niche of each ASV, all ASVs in the respective AS and AD systems were classified as either generalist, transient, or specialist taxa based on occurrence frequency. ASVs with an estimated observed occurrence above or below the 95% confidence interval were classified as generalist or specialist taxa, respectively, whereas ASVs with an estimated observed occurrence within the 95% confidence interval were classified as transient taxa. , ASVs classified as generalist taxa are considered to be widely distributed among the systems (i.e., thriving under a wide range of environmental conditions and using an assortment of resources), whereas ASVs classified as specialist taxa are rare or occur only in a limited number of systems (i.e., having limited adaptability to environmental conditions and limited diet range) . The ASV niche classification was determined with the quasiswap permutation algorithm with 999 permutations using the EcolUtils E package (v0.1) in R.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,41 ASVs classified as generalist taxa are considered to be widely distributed among the systems (i.e., thriving under a wide range of environmental conditions and using an assortment of resources), whereas ASVs classified as specialist taxa are rare or occur only in a limited number of systems (i.e., having limited adaptability to environmental conditions and limited diet range). 42 The ASV niche classification was determined with the quasiswap permutation algorithm with 999 permutations using the EcolUtils E package (v0.1) in R.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The niche.width function of the spaa package was used to calculate niche breadth indexes of 25 plant families, and niche overlap indexes among 25 plant families were run by the niche.overlap function of the spaa package (Levins, 1968). According to the niche breadth index, the species were divided into three categories: generalist species, specialist species, and neutral taxa (Wilson & Hayek, 2015). All analyses were performed in R 3.6.0 (R Core Team, 2013).…”
Section: Niche Breadth and Niche Overlap Indexes Of Different Plant F...mentioning
confidence: 99%