2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing the precision of spatial recollection from its success: Evidence from healthy aging and unilateral mesial temporal lobe resection

Abstract: Successful episodic recollection can vary in the precision of the information recalled. The hypothesis that recollection precision requires functional neuroanatomical contributions distinct from those required for recollection success remains controversial. Some findings in individuals with hippocampal lesions have indicated that precision is dependent on the hippocampus. However, other neuroimaging and lesion studies have implicated regions outside of the mesial temporal lobe (MTL) in precision, such as parie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

21
80
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
21
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings of age-related degradation of the precision of episodic memory retrieval are consistent with previous accounts proposing a loss of quality, and specificity, of memory representations in older age (Burke et al, 2018;Goh, 2011;Li, Lindenberger, & Sikström, 2001;Trelle et al, 2017). The observed pattern of reduced precision with preserved retrieval success is in line with studies proposing that while memory for the gist of an event, or stimulus, might be preserved in ageing, the more fine-grained details tend to be lost (Dennis et al, 2007(Dennis et al, , 2008Kensinger & Schacter, 1999;Nilakantan et al, 2018). However, whereas previous experiments have predominantly relied on categorical measures of memory success, tasks that emphasise spatial features exclusively, or comparisons between tasks conditions to draw inferences about changes in memory quality, the current study provides a more direct and versatile behavioural measure of memory fidelity, separable from differences in the probability of successful retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The current findings of age-related degradation of the precision of episodic memory retrieval are consistent with previous accounts proposing a loss of quality, and specificity, of memory representations in older age (Burke et al, 2018;Goh, 2011;Li, Lindenberger, & Sikström, 2001;Trelle et al, 2017). The observed pattern of reduced precision with preserved retrieval success is in line with studies proposing that while memory for the gist of an event, or stimulus, might be preserved in ageing, the more fine-grained details tend to be lost (Dennis et al, 2007(Dennis et al, , 2008Kensinger & Schacter, 1999;Nilakantan et al, 2018). However, whereas previous experiments have predominantly relied on categorical measures of memory success, tasks that emphasise spatial features exclusively, or comparisons between tasks conditions to draw inferences about changes in memory quality, the current study provides a more direct and versatile behavioural measure of memory fidelity, separable from differences in the probability of successful retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This apparent discrepancy might be explained by age-related decreases on categorical measures of memory success in previous studies being partially attributable to reduced fidelity of the underlying memory representations, rather than a failure to retrieve the representations per se (Nilakantan et al, 2018). For instance, a failure to discriminate between two similar sources of memories, such between two female or two male voices (Simons et al, 2004), could result from a noisier memory representation of the source, leading to selection of the incorrect retrieval response, and thereby reduced retrieval success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is different from much of the schema literature in two ways: (1) our measures of schema-consistency and memory precision are continuous, measured by each image's proximity to the central location of all images of the same category, and the distance between its encoded and retrieved location, respectively, and (2) participants needed to map prior knowledge of category membership onto new, trial-specific spatial information to learn a new schema about the locations of images. Past uses of continuous retrieval reports have enabled researchers to distinguish the precision of episodic memories from their overall retrieval success 38,39 , reveal subtle memory deficits in healthy aging and in patients with altered MTL function 40 , and map separate neural contributions to different aspects of memory retrieval, such as precision, confidence, and vividness 41,42 . In contrast, most research in schematic memory tends to discretize memoranda as schema-consistent or not, using prior knowledge that participants already know, like famous faces, word pairs that are semantically related word pairs, or dot patterns that resemble letters [43][44][45] , although there are numerous exceptions 11,16,17,31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%