Feminist Methodologies for International Relations 2006
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511617690.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distracted reflections on the production, narration, and refusal of feminist knowledge in International Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Katharine Moon has consistently used interpretive methodologies to make women's lives more visible within the larger discourses important to the field of IR such as national security, development and nationalism. 48 Katharine Moon has consistently used interpretive methodologies to make women's lives more visible within the larger discourses important to the field of IR such as national security, development and nationalism.…”
Section: Ethnography: Operationalising the Paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Katharine Moon has consistently used interpretive methodologies to make women's lives more visible within the larger discourses important to the field of IR such as national security, development and nationalism. 48 Katharine Moon has consistently used interpretive methodologies to make women's lives more visible within the larger discourses important to the field of IR such as national security, development and nationalism.…”
Section: Ethnography: Operationalising the Paradoxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Runyan and Peterson 1991: 89) Peterson's work reminds us that a central mechanism of capitalism, so clearly evident in contemporary practices of globalization and the (re)production of hegemony, is 'forgetting' (Joseph 2002: 268). Sifting through seemingly rock solid ideologies of state securitizing practices in western modernity, Peterson exposes the obscured but hugely effective practices of 'forgetting' the human costs of our unreflective reproduction of categories of domination (Peterson 1992b: 38;Zalewski 2005). As her collaborators, teachers and students attest, Peterson strives to 'walk her talk' by challenging these dominations personally and politically.…”
Section: (Sr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist IR scholars encourage us to adopt a "feminist curiosity" (Enloe, 2004, p. 3), investigate "sites of everyday life" (Enloe, 2004, p. 5), challenge disciplinary practices that seek to shape who and how we study (Doty, 2001;Sylvester, 2009;Zalewski, 2006), and regard "theorising as a way of life, a form of life, something we all do, every day, all the time" (Zalewski, 1996, p. 346). The feminist IR literature reminds us to ask: For whom is this theory (Zalewski, 1996)?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%