1991
DOI: 10.1016/0956-0521(91)90008-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed finite element calculations on transputer arrays and the DAP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EBE preconditioning considers the h = P-lr stage of the PCG algorithm by accumulating the individual factorizations of the element equations. The parallel efficiency of these schemes appears high although inaccuracies have been reported (see for example, Willis and Wait, 1989). At present there does not appear to be common agreement on optimum general purpose preconditioners for subsurface problems.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…EBE preconditioning considers the h = P-lr stage of the PCG algorithm by accumulating the individual factorizations of the element equations. The parallel efficiency of these schemes appears high although inaccuracies have been reported (see for example, Willis and Wait, 1989). At present there does not appear to be common agreement on optimum general purpose preconditioners for subsurface problems.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The software is centred on an iterative solver using the preconditioned conjugate gradient method, developed using Occam2 and TDS, see [2], which has been modified for this investigation to facilitate the assembly of the global matrix.. The relevant section of the Algorithm is the calculation of the element matrices and assembly of the global matrix.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangements and Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%