2020
DOI: 10.3390/math8111948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Fusion Estimation with Sensor Gain Degradation and Markovian Delays

Abstract: This paper investigates the distributed fusion estimation of a signal for a class of multi-sensor systems with random uncertainties both in the sensor outputs and during the transmission connections. The measured outputs are assumed to be affected by multiplicative noises, which degrade the signal, and delays may occur during transmission. These uncertainties are commonly described by means of independent Bernoulli random variables. In the present paper, the model is generalised in two directions: (i) at each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account (A2) and (A5) for y (j) s/s−1 and y (j/i) s/s−1 , respectively, it is seen that J (ij) s−1,s satisfies (23). Expression ( 24) is straightforwardly derived using (13) and…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking into account (A2) and (A5) for y (j) s/s−1 and y (j/i) s/s−1 , respectively, it is seen that J (ij) s−1,s satisfies (23). Expression ( 24) is straightforwardly derived using (13) and…”
Section: Appendix a Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies of one-step random delays modelled by Bernoulli random variables, various types of distributed fusion estimation algorithms have been proposed, assuming either that these variables are independent (see for example, [15][16][17][18]) or that they are correlated at consecutive sampling times [19,20]. In addition, various distributed fusion estimation algorithms describing random delays by Markov chains have been derived (see, for example, [21][22][23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%