2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11633-014-0780-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed H ∞ PID Feedback for Improving Consensus Performance of Arbitrary-delayed Multi-agent System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xu, Peng, and Guo (2018) investigated the consensus problem for a class of nonlinear MASs with stochastic uncertainties and disturbances; a novel impulsive control protocol is presented to reduce the control cost effectively. The H ∞ PID feedback for an arbitrary-order delayed multi-agent system is investigated to improve the system performance, based on the extended Hermite-Biehler theorem in Ou, Chen, Zhang, and Zhang (2014). The consensus problem of a class of MASs with uncertain topology and partially unknown control directions is studied in Chen, Li, Zhang, and Wei (2019).…”
Section: Consensus Subjected To Communication Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu, Peng, and Guo (2018) investigated the consensus problem for a class of nonlinear MASs with stochastic uncertainties and disturbances; a novel impulsive control protocol is presented to reduce the control cost effectively. The H ∞ PID feedback for an arbitrary-order delayed multi-agent system is investigated to improve the system performance, based on the extended Hermite-Biehler theorem in Ou, Chen, Zhang, and Zhang (2014). The consensus problem of a class of MASs with uncertain topology and partially unknown control directions is studied in Chen, Li, Zhang, and Wei (2019).…”
Section: Consensus Subjected To Communication Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Define υfalse(s;kp1,ki1,kd1,ϕfalse) as right leftthickmathspace.5emυ(s;kp1,ki1,kd1,ϕ)=sλV~(s)+U~(s)(kd1sλ+μ+kp1sλ+ki1),where Vfalse~false(sfalse)=Wdfalse(sfalse)Vfalse(sfalse), Ufalse~false(sfalse)=false(Wdfalse(sfalse)+normalejϕWnfalse(sfalse)/ζfalse)Ufalse(sfalse) and ϕfalse(0,2πfalse]. From the results in [5], the region ensuring the stability of υfalse(s;kp1,ki1,kd1,ϕfalse) for each ϕ in the interval false(0,2πfalse] is exactly the robust region of c1false(sfalse). Suppose that Ufalse~false(sfalse)=i=0mfalse~b~isβ…”
Section: Controller Design Of the Two‐degree‐of‐freedom Multi‐agentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, given the common P-like controller, one can easily think of a more general PID-like structure. In continuous-time, for instance, [14] propose a PI-like distributed algorithm for single integrator dynamic agents, and [15] provide a PID-like controller for general high-order SISO systems. Similar control design is applied to solve a leader-follower consensus under time-varying reference state, as in [16], and in its sampled-data counterpart [17], where a PD-like protocol is given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%