2016
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2015.2495154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Stochastic Learning and Adaptation to Primary Traffic for Dynamic Spectrum Access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…throughput loss). These algorithms have been selected as they have shown to outperform DMC [11] and algorithms such as [7][8][9][10] and hence, we don't include the rest to maintain the clarity of plots. All the results presented here are obtained after averaging over 50 experiments and each experiment consists of the horizon of 10 5 time slots.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…throughput loss). These algorithms have been selected as they have shown to outperform DMC [11] and algorithms such as [7][8][9][10] and hence, we don't include the rest to maintain the clarity of plots. All the results presented here are obtained after averaging over 50 experiments and each experiment consists of the horizon of 10 5 time slots.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various distributed algorithms have been proposed to facilitate learning and coordination tasks in static networks where the network parameters do not change with time [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. The musical chair (MC) based MCTopM algorithm in [3] is the current state-of-the-art algorithm for static networks but assumes prior knowledge of the number of users, N which is not practical for ad-hoc networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified ρ EST algorithm overcomes latter issue, but its guarantees holds only asymptotically. Other set of works in [15], [16] considers selfish behavior of players and analyze their equilibrium behavior. However, all these algorithms work only for the static case and cannot extend to the dynamic scenarios which is the focus of this work.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is assumed to be independently and identically distributed across time slots and unknown to the SUs and the jammers. The same network model is considered for the study of non-cooperative CRN in several works including [5], [11], [10] [13]. Other important aspects of networking like, rendezvous, error-free sensing, time-synchronization are important but not considered here to keep the focus of the paper on the learning aspects as done in other papers [5], [11], [10] [13].…”
Section: Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%