2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-9055(02)00247-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributing non-MARC metadata: the CUGIR metadata sharing project

Abstract: Technical Service departments throughout libraries today are increasingly in the position to create and maintain non-MARC metadata that may be shared among institutions. The Cornell University Geospatial Information Repository (CUGIR) Metadata Sharing Project is an example of a system that manages heterogeneous metadata such as MARC, Dublin Core, and Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM). The mechanics and policies required to exchange MARC records are mature and well understood. In contrast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…20 According to Chandler and Westbrooks, construction of open systems and methods that provide the ability to link between different types of metadata is the path to information discovery. 21 They also discuss the need for the library technical services departments to be proactive not only in the creation and maintenance of non-MARC metadata, but more importantly, in the development of a means for widely sharing metadata with libraries that require it for resource discovery and access. Ahronheim and Marko cite the need for catalogers to participate in both the development and use of descriptive standards because standards easily allow data to be reused.…”
Section: Using Xml and Xsltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 According to Chandler and Westbrooks, construction of open systems and methods that provide the ability to link between different types of metadata is the path to information discovery. 21 They also discuss the need for the library technical services departments to be proactive not only in the creation and maintenance of non-MARC metadata, but more importantly, in the development of a means for widely sharing metadata with libraries that require it for resource discovery and access. Ahronheim and Marko cite the need for catalogers to participate in both the development and use of descriptive standards because standards easily allow data to be reused.…”
Section: Using Xml and Xsltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linking among metadata value occurrences is an emerging activity that bears watching from a metadata management perspective. (2) Investigate the programmatic use of models such as the Simple Bucket Digital Object Model (Chandler and Westbrooks, 2002) and the Master Metadata File model (Davis, 1998;Mandel, 1998) for collocating metadata elements and values intended to be shared among distributed metadata records. Some models for managing related metadata occurrences involve collocating metadata elements from related records in a single digital object.…”
Section: Recommendations For Further Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIS are computer systems that are capable of assembling, storing, manipulating, analyzing, and displaying geographically referenced information (Chandler andWestbrooks 2002, Guo 2009). Several MCDM techniques have been used to solve facility location planning problems including ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE), Preference…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%