1983
DOI: 10.1139/f83-271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and Behavior of Fine Sediment in the Severn Estuary and Inner Bristol Channel, U.K.

Abstract: During the 10 yr, 1970–80 a variety of field measurements using some new techniques have allowed the distribution of muddy sediment in the Severn Estuary and Inner Bristol Channel to be defined. Based on these measurements, a behavioral model has been adopted comprising mobile and stationary suspensions, and settled mud. The regional distribution of mobile suspensions shows a suspended solids front located along the main channel axis with the more turbid water on the southern, English, side. At maximum current… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the strong influences of marine water, tide and river discharge, the occurrence of ETMs is complex and difficult to predict [1,2]. They are trapping a lot of suspended matter and encompass a huge range of SPM concentrations with maximum values from less than 100 mg L −1 like in the Kennebec Estuary, USA [3,4] to >200 g L −1 like in the Severn Estuary, UK [5]. The settling of SPM in an ETM has been well documented in the Gironde Estuary [6][7][8], the Hudson estuary [9][10][11], the Columbia River estuary [12], the Seine estuary [13], the upper Chesapeake Bay [14,15], and the Humber Estuary [16], amongst others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the strong influences of marine water, tide and river discharge, the occurrence of ETMs is complex and difficult to predict [1,2]. They are trapping a lot of suspended matter and encompass a huge range of SPM concentrations with maximum values from less than 100 mg L −1 like in the Kennebec Estuary, USA [3,4] to >200 g L −1 like in the Severn Estuary, UK [5]. The settling of SPM in an ETM has been well documented in the Gironde Estuary [6][7][8], the Hudson estuary [9][10][11], the Columbia River estuary [12], the Seine estuary [13], the upper Chesapeake Bay [14,15], and the Humber Estuary [16], amongst others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative measurements offluidmudjn_J;heS_exenuvere ! !_Q_1;_available but the behaviour of the model fits well with the description of fluid mud in the Severn given by Kirby and Parker [2]. It is planned to further develop the model to include the effect of waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The ADI method was used, with staggered grid for the derivative in respect to space and Leap-frog scheme for time. The corresponding difference equations are given in previous paper (Chung and.Roberts [2]. Therefore the model shows to be applicable in practice, and that the numerical simulation can be fully carried out on PC.…”
Section: Numerical Solutions and A Test Applicationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Of particular importance, a quantitative understanding of the dynamics of the vertical structure of cohesive sediments in suspensions is essential for an accurate estuarine sedimentation model (Kirby, 1986;van Leussen, 1991). This requires an understanding of the physical processes related to the entrainment, advection and deposition of muddy sediments.…”
Section: Examples Of the Application Of Different Floc Depositional Mmentioning
confidence: 99%