2004
DOI: 10.1071/wr02005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and habitat of the desert mouse (Pseudomys desertor) in Queensland

Abstract: Two systematic regional fauna surveys conducted in the central-north of the state, and an ancillary review of existing published data, identified many new localities and provided an opportunity to describe aspects of this species' ecology and habitat. As well as in typical Triodia grasslands, Pseudomys desertor was recorded in a wide range of sub-tropical savanna woodland, shrubland and grassland vegetation types, many within a zone with rainfall of 500–750 mm. In these higher-rainfall areas, average bodyweigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the other mammal species recorded in the study region, there are a suite of species (all Pseudomys spp., Leggadina forresti, Sminthopsis crassicaudata, S. macroura, S. murina ) that are considered to be stable in population status in northern Australia, and within a correspondingly lower selectivity range. A number of these are known to exhibit a degree of disturbance tolerance, are rapid breeders if conditions are suitable, and relatively common in their current distribution (Dickman et al ., ; Kutt, Thurgate & Hannah, ; Price et al ., ). However, these species are also reported to be vulnerable to poor grazing and fire management (Kutt & Woinarski, ; Legge et al ., ), have been reported in the diets of feral cats in other regions (Paltridge, ), and are more abundant where predators are absent (Moseby, Hill & Read, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the other mammal species recorded in the study region, there are a suite of species (all Pseudomys spp., Leggadina forresti, Sminthopsis crassicaudata, S. macroura, S. murina ) that are considered to be stable in population status in northern Australia, and within a correspondingly lower selectivity range. A number of these are known to exhibit a degree of disturbance tolerance, are rapid breeders if conditions are suitable, and relatively common in their current distribution (Dickman et al ., ; Kutt, Thurgate & Hannah, ; Price et al ., ). However, these species are also reported to be vulnerable to poor grazing and fire management (Kutt & Woinarski, ; Legge et al ., ), have been reported in the diets of feral cats in other regions (Paltridge, ), and are more abundant where predators are absent (Moseby, Hill & Read, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite observations of mammals exploiting fire‐mosaics, however, there is little evidence to suggest that any arid zone species is dependent on them or that the provision of mixed burnt and unburnt habitats consistently increases species richness or population sizes (Short & Turner, 1994; Letnic & Dickman, 2005). Although some small mammal species such as Pseudomys desertor (Letnic, 2003; Kutt, Thurgate & Hannah, 2004) and Dasykaluta rosamondae (How & Cooper, 2002) may exhibit strong preferences for long‐unburnt habitats (Coventry & Dixon, 1984; Kutt et al , 2004; How & Cooper, 2002; Letnic, 2003), others show no consistent preference for recently burnt or long‐unburnt habitats (Masters, 1993; Southgate & Masters, 1996; How & Cooper, 2002; Letnic & Dickman, 2005; Körtner, Pavey & Geiser, 2007). The fire‐mosaic model receives little support from reports that small mammal abundance and species richness decrease following wildfires or the fact that no small mammal species shows a consistent preference for recently burnt areas (Coventry & Dixon, 1984; How & Cooper, 2002; Letnic et al , 2005).…”
Section: Current Models Explaining Mammalian Population Dynamics mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review indicates that small mammal assemblages in the spinifex grasslands of central Australia correlate poorly in terms of both composition and abundance with structural variables indicative of vegetation succession or habitat type (Masters, 1993; Southgate & Masters, 1996; Paltridge & Southgate, 2001; Letnic, 2003). Whereas a few species are associated with dense spinifex habitats (Masters, 1998; Letnic, 2003; Kutt et al , 2004; Letnic & Dickman, 2005), rainfall history, food resource availability and predation pressure appear to be more important factors influencing small mammal assemblages than vegetation structure (Paltridge & Southgate, 2001; Letnic, 2003; Letnic et al , 2005). Similarly, there is little evidence that inter‐specific competition is an important factor structuring small mammal assemblages in arid Australia (Morton et al , 1994).…”
Section: A State‐and‐transition Model For Small Mammals Occupying mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low numbers of mammals recorded are typical of the trapping returns from surveys in northern Australia, and as with results from surveys of fragmented landscapes in the Darwin region, they suggest that broader landscape and climate factors are more important than small-scale disturbance (Price et al 2005). The determinants of mammals in the landscapes of northern Australia seem to be more insidious widespread threats of feral animal predation and wholescale land-management change (Woinarski et al 2011) rather than any small-scale clearing effects (Kutt et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%