2009
DOI: 10.1128/aem.02612-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and Rate of Microbial Processes in an Ammonia-Loaded Air Filter Biofilm

Abstract: The in situ activity and distribution of heterotrophic and nitrifying bacteria and their potential interactions were investigated in a full-scale, two-section, trickling filter designed for biological degradation of volatile organics and NH 3 in ventilation air from pig farms. The filter biofilm was investigated by microsensor analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, quantitative PCR, and batch incubation activity measurements. In situ aerobic activity showed a significant decrease through the filter, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental quality regulation Sewage and waste treatment (Bitton, 2010;Minz et al, 2010) Nitrifiers, denitrifiers, P accumulators, flocs formers, aerobic organic matter degraders, anaerobic fermenters, methanogens Specific microbial activities OECD 209, OECD 224, ISO 15522, ISO 9509 Biofilters (Juhler et al, 2009;Zearley and Summers, 2012) Nitrifiers, contaminant degraders etc. (depend on specific filter function) Specific microbial activities Specific tests to be standardized Natural attenuation of contaminants (Wackett and Hershberger, 2001) Specific fungal and bacterial degrader strains belonging to various genera Specific microbial activities Specific tests to be standardized Human health risk regulation Pathogen mitigation (Chee-Sanford et al, 2009) Competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria of human or animal origin Pathogen abundance Specific tests to be standardized Antibiotic resistance (AR) mitigation (CheeSanford et al, 2009) Competitive exclusion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria of human or animal origin Community tolerance and antibiotic resistance Specific tests to be standardized Cultural services Negligible c Supporting services Primary productivity (photosynthesis) (Paerl, 2002) Cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae Growth of primary producers OECD 201, ISO 10253 Secondary productivity (heterotrophic growth) (ChinLeo, 2002) Heterotrophic bacteria, archaea and fungi Growth (biomass production) of secondary producers ISO 10712, ISO 15522…”
Section: Not Yet Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Environmental quality regulation Sewage and waste treatment (Bitton, 2010;Minz et al, 2010) Nitrifiers, denitrifiers, P accumulators, flocs formers, aerobic organic matter degraders, anaerobic fermenters, methanogens Specific microbial activities OECD 209, OECD 224, ISO 15522, ISO 9509 Biofilters (Juhler et al, 2009;Zearley and Summers, 2012) Nitrifiers, contaminant degraders etc. (depend on specific filter function) Specific microbial activities Specific tests to be standardized Natural attenuation of contaminants (Wackett and Hershberger, 2001) Specific fungal and bacterial degrader strains belonging to various genera Specific microbial activities Specific tests to be standardized Human health risk regulation Pathogen mitigation (Chee-Sanford et al, 2009) Competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria of human or animal origin Pathogen abundance Specific tests to be standardized Antibiotic resistance (AR) mitigation (CheeSanford et al, 2009) Competitive exclusion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria of human or animal origin Community tolerance and antibiotic resistance Specific tests to be standardized Cultural services Negligible c Supporting services Primary productivity (photosynthesis) (Paerl, 2002) Cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae Growth of primary producers OECD 201, ISO 10253 Secondary productivity (heterotrophic growth) (ChinLeo, 2002) Heterotrophic bacteria, archaea and fungi Growth (biomass production) of secondary producers ISO 10712, ISO 15522…”
Section: Not Yet Availablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NH 4 + -N = 150.391amoA/archaea + 950.531(nirS + nirK)/anammox + 2.659anammox/(narG + napA) À 619.955(amoA + napA + narG)/ (nxrA + anammox + nirS + nirK) + 30.562 À -N = 3.565(narG + napA)/(narG + napA + nirS + nirK + qnorB + nosZ) À 107.550anammox/bacteria À 8.746nosZ/ (narG + napA + nirS + nirK + qnorB + nosZ) + 0.330 amoA + napA + narG)/(nxrA + anammox + nirS + nirK) had a direct negative contribution on the NH 4 + -N transformation rate (À21.6%), suggesting that NO 2 À -N accumulation in the biofilter was not conducive to the removal of NH 4 + -N(Juhler et al, 2009). …”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Various types of Gammaproteobacteria have been proposed to be important degraders of butyric acid in a biofilter by means of cultivation, but Sheridan et al (45) also noted that Gammaproteobacteria are fast growing in cultures, possibly overgrowing important microorganisms. Major parts of the biofilm in the SKOV-type biofilter are oxic (20), which reflects the aerobic microbial community taking up butyric acid identified in the present study with the exception of Propionibacterium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Finally, ammonia was completely eliminated by the primary filter. Ammonia was likely oxidized by nitrifying bacteria, which have been detected in a similar biofilter (20), causing the accumulated concentrations of nitrate and nitrite. Thus, various VOCs with different properties and ammonia emitted from the pig facility were removed by the SKOV-type biofilter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation