1993
DOI: 10.1080/02827589309382774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of a bark beetle and its predator within and outside old growth forest reserves: No increase of hazard near reserves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…were more abundant in the managed forest (Table 3c; Fig. 1c) than in the reserve, as was also reported for T. formicarius by Schlyter and Lundgren (1993) in Sweden. T. formicarius is a generalist and has been recorded as a predator of more than 20 species of bark beetles, both on coniferous and deciduous trees (Gauss 1954).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…were more abundant in the managed forest (Table 3c; Fig. 1c) than in the reserve, as was also reported for T. formicarius by Schlyter and Lundgren (1993) in Sweden. T. formicarius is a generalist and has been recorded as a predator of more than 20 species of bark beetles, both on coniferous and deciduous trees (Gauss 1954).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…A possible explanation for the disparity is that Thanasimus sp. may be favored by the more open and sunny stands in managed forests (Schlyter and Lundgren 1993), where open spaces, such as roads and clear-cuts are more frequent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight out of 22 species found occurred in all studied stands. Martikainen et al (1999) found that managed spruce forests with one-age class favour some bark beetle species of a narrower species spectrum which can reduce competition with other pests, predation and parasitism (Schlyter and Lundgren 1993), which in natural stands control their populations. A preference for certain forest development phases and forest structure was also found in various vertebrates (e.g.…”
Section: Centipede Communities In Different Forest Development Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fi nding is in agreement with those of Kautz et al (2011b) and Lausch et al (2011Lausch et al ( , 2013 who record that 95% of the new infestations occurred within 500 m. Similar conclusions are drawn by authors that recently studied the question of spruce bark beetle population levels in unmanaged and surrounding managed forests. Generally, it can be concluded that under non-epidemic conditions, unmanaged stands do not necessarily pose a threat to surrounding managed forests (Schlyter & Lundgren, 1993). However, rapid population growth in unmanaged stands may threaten neighboring managed forests at distances of up to 500 m following abiotic disturbances (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%