2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00374-007-0261-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores in soils of smallholder agroforestry and monocultural coffee systems in southwestern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
66
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
66
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fluctuation in the number of MVA spores observed could be attributed to the process of spore formation, their germination and degradation (Smith, 1980), the sampling season (Gemma et al, 1999), soil and climatic variations (Koske, 1987;Johnson et al, 1991) and soil microorganisms (Dalpe, 1989). We found the spores of genera Glomus to be dominant, as has been reported elsewhere from Latin America (Lopes et al 1983;Cruz 1989) and southwestern Ethiopia (Muleta et al, 2008;Jefwa et al, 2009), dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia (Tesfaye et al, 2004), the tropical rain forest of Xishuangbanna, China (Zhao et al, 2001), tropical rain forest in Mexico (Guadarrama and AlvarezSanchez, 1999), and the arid and semi arid lands of North Jordan (Mohammad et al, 2003). Different authors have associated the high incidence of Glomus spores with their capacity to produce more spores in a shorter time than other genera such as Gigaspora and Scutellospora (Bever et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The fluctuation in the number of MVA spores observed could be attributed to the process of spore formation, their germination and degradation (Smith, 1980), the sampling season (Gemma et al, 1999), soil and climatic variations (Koske, 1987;Johnson et al, 1991) and soil microorganisms (Dalpe, 1989). We found the spores of genera Glomus to be dominant, as has been reported elsewhere from Latin America (Lopes et al 1983;Cruz 1989) and southwestern Ethiopia (Muleta et al, 2008;Jefwa et al, 2009), dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia (Tesfaye et al, 2004), the tropical rain forest of Xishuangbanna, China (Zhao et al, 2001), tropical rain forest in Mexico (Guadarrama and AlvarezSanchez, 1999), and the arid and semi arid lands of North Jordan (Mohammad et al, 2003). Different authors have associated the high incidence of Glomus spores with their capacity to produce more spores in a shorter time than other genera such as Gigaspora and Scutellospora (Bever et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Families of Acanthaceae, Boraginaceae, Meliaceae, and Moraceae had significantly higher spore density 100 g −1 dry soil while lowest spore counts were found in Aloeaceae, Cactaceae, and Polygonaceae rhizosphere soils. Low AMF spore count was reported by Muleta et al (2008) for coffee and in a dry savannah wood land ecosystem under Acacia polyacantha rhizosphere soil .…”
Section: Amf In Different Woody Plant Species and Their Familiesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The predominance of Glomus species under varying soil conditions might be due to its wide adaptability to the varied soil conditions and survive in acidic as well as in alkaline soils (Tanvir et al 2011;Pande and Tarafdar 2004). Spore density in undisturbed natural environment is higher than disturbed sites (Chanie and Assefa 2013;Muleta et al 2008). AMF plays a role in the formation of stable soil aggregates, building up a macroporous structure of soil that allows penetration of water and air and prevents erosion (Rillig 2004;Borie et al 2008;Aggarwal et al 2011); therefore, the application of AMF is of interest for the reclamation and revegetation of degraded lands (Miller and Jastrow 1992).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The native trees showed higher AM colonization when mixed compared to monoculture. Agroforestry systems are usually more productive and allow a larger diversity and/or abundance of AM than monocultures [2,17,46,112]. Microscopic examination of sections shows that all the native species presented Arum-type colonization in their roots, and significant AM morphological structures were documented (extraradical hyphae, intraradical hyphae, hyphal coils, arbuscules, and vesicles).…”
Section: Seasonal Development Of Mycorrhizas In Forested Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%