2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of bathyal meiofauna in the region of the Subtropical Front, Chatham Rise, south-west Pacific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous descriptions of elevated benthic biomass and SCOC on the crest and southern flanks of the Chatham Rise were replicated in the present study and are likely to indicate the effect of higher organic flux at these sites (Probert and McKnight 1993;Nodder et al 2003;Grove et al 2006). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Previous descriptions of elevated benthic biomass and SCOC on the crest and southern flanks of the Chatham Rise were replicated in the present study and are likely to indicate the effect of higher organic flux at these sites (Probert and McKnight 1993;Nodder et al 2003;Grove et al 2006). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The Chatham Rise is a broad submarine ridge extending eastwards from the South Island of New Zealand at water depths of 350 to 3000 m. The highly productive Subtropical Front (STF) appears to be bathymetrically locked onto the southern flank of the rise near 44° S (Murphy et al 2001, Sutton 2001. Meio-and macrofaunal biomass peaks on the southern flank of the rise near the STF and declines rapidly below 1200 m depth, particularly on the northern flank of the rise (Probert & McKnight 1993, Nodder et al 2003, Grove et al 2006, Berkenbusch et al 2011. Nine sites on the Chatham Rise were sampled in September to October 2001 along a transect at 178°30' E (350 to 3100 m water depth; Table 1 The Kaikoura Canyon lies to the east of the South Island (~42°S), and has been described as one of the most productive deep-sea benthic habitats known (De Leo et al 2010).…”
Section: Sampling and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DW: dry weight; ES(51): expected number of species for a sample of 51 ind. Asterisks (*) are diversity data from Leduc et al (2012) length and maximum body width measurements obtained by video image analysis (Nodder et al 2003, Grove et al 2006. Body volumes were converted to dry weight (DW) based on a relative density of 1.13, and a dry:wet weight ratio of 0.25 (Feller & Warwick 1988).…”
Section: Sampling and Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five haphazardly allocated cores (2.6 cm diameter, 2 cm depth) were taken and fixed in 5% formalin for estimation of meiofaunal and harpacticoid copepod abundance and biomass. Samples were extracted using the Ludox flotation technique and biomass estimated using video image analysis (Grove et al 2006). The microcosms were immediately brought to the Portobello Marine Laboratory and each microcosm was provided with 2 seawater inflows at opposite corners and left to settle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%