Describing large-scale patterns of biological diversity is a first step towards understanding the mechanisms that generate and maintain diversity. The highly diverse deep-sea floor is the largest ecosystem on Earth, but the productivity−diversity relationship in this biome is not well characterized. We investigated this relationship by using biomass of nematodes as a proxy for productivity (particulate organic carbon flux to the seabed). We used sample data collected from the New Zealand and Antarctic regions and combined these with published data from around the globe for broader analyses. There was a significant unimodal relationship between nematode biomass and diversity, i.e. expected number of species, ES(51) both within the New Zealand region and across ocean basins. This relationship remained significant after accounting for the effects of both water depth and nematode abundance. These findings support earlier suggestions of a unimodal productivity−diversity relationship in the deep sea that were based on other proxies (e.g. water depth, modelled particulate organic carbon flux). We argue that the 'productivity context' is of primary importance when determining the strength and nature of the relationship between other environmental factors and diversity. Studies that include either or both extremes of the productivity scale are likely to find that productivity is the main factor limiting deep-sea diversity, whereas those focusing on the intermediate productivity range are more likely to find that other factors (e.g. disturbance, habitat heterogeneity) play a role.KEY WORDS: Southwest Pacific · Kaikoura Canyon · Ross Sea · Southern Ocean · Nematodes · Macroecology · Biomass
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 454: [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] 2012 ships are also common (Mittelbach et al. 2001, Witman et al. 2008. A number of underlying mechanisms have been proposed to explain productivity− diversity relationships, although there is much debate about their relative contributions (Rosenzweig 1992, Waide et al. 1999, Gross & Cardinale 2007. As the number of individuals increases with productivity, diversity may increase through higher proportions of rare (Preston 1962) and specialist species (Evans et al. 2006), lowered extinction rates and/or higher speciation rates (Rex 1973, Wright 1983. Negative productivity−diversity relationships may result from increased rates of competitive exclusion (Grime 1973, Rosenzweig & Abramsky 1993, temporal variability in productivity (Chown & Gaston 1999) or environmental stress (e.g. hypoxia, Levin & Gage 1998). A combination of these mechanisms, operating to increase and decrease diversity, might be responsible for the unimodal productivity−diversity relationship often observed.Most of our knowledge of productivity−diversity relationships has been gained from terrestrial and shallow aquatic habitats (e.g. Mittelbach et al. 2001). Such relationships, however, have not been well char...