2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-011-0656-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of brine in grain boundaries during static recrystallization in wet, synthetic halite: insight from broad ion beam sectioning and SEM observation at cryogenic temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5a and b). The same pattern was observed by Schenk et al (2006), Blackford (2007), Blackford et al (2007) and Desbois et al (2008Desbois et al ( , 2011Desbois et al ( , 2012 in laboratory-processed halite samples. According to these authors, the "foam" structure is produced by the sublimation of ice crystals leaving behind voids in the hydrohalite precipitate.…”
Section: Low Temperature Semsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…5a and b). The same pattern was observed by Schenk et al (2006), Blackford (2007), Blackford et al (2007) and Desbois et al (2008Desbois et al ( , 2011Desbois et al ( , 2012 in laboratory-processed halite samples. According to these authors, the "foam" structure is produced by the sublimation of ice crystals leaving behind voids in the hydrohalite precipitate.…”
Section: Low Temperature Semsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Figure 1 presents the different microscopy methods, which have been used for microstructural investigations in sedimentary rocks with corresponding typical cross‐section areas and related 2D and 3D resolution achieved by each technique, up to date. Three‐dimensional atom probe (Gordon & Joester, 2011), transmission electron microscopy (Moore et al , 2009; Hooshiar et al , 2010) – electron tomography (Midgley & Dunin‐Borkowski, 2009), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with focussed ion beam (FIB) and broad ion beam (BIB; Desbois et al , 2008, 2009, 2011, 2012a, b; Loucks et al , 2009; Holzer et al , 2010; Keller et al , 2011; Schneider et al , 2011; Houben et al , 2013; Klaver et al , 2012), X‐ray tomography (Tono & Ingrain, 2008; Desrues et al , 2010), confocal microscopy (Friedrich, 1999; Menendez et al , 2001; Petford et al , 2001) and nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy (Pape et al , 2005; Chen et al , 2006) allow investigating microstructures in sedimentary rocks occurring from scale of the atom to the scale of a core sample (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For X‐ray tomography, confocal microscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy, this is no longer a problem since these techniques do not require dry samples and work at atmospheric pressure; but techniques related to high vacuum electron microscopy require dry samples. Therefore, cryogenic methods have been applied to SEM imaging to first rapidly freeze the samples to very low temperatures, which effectively quenches the aqueous phase without crystallization of the fluids, and secondly to allow SEM imaging at cryogenic temperatures (Fassi‐Fihri et al , 1992; Durand & Rosenberg, 1998; Fauchadour et al , 1999; Schenk et al , 2006; Holzer et al , 2007, 2010; Desbois et al , 2008, 2009, 2012a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FIB-based micro-excavation of buried fluid inclusions has been employed for the SEM-EDS analysis of daughter minerals and precipitated salts such as Fe-K(-Mn) chlorides (Assadzadeh et al, 2016). However, this novel tool can be combined with a cold stage for application to the direct analysis of liquid materials (i.e., using cryo-FIB; e.g., Desbois et al, 2008Desbois et al, , 2012, resulting in high-resolution observation of the wet boundaries of minerals. A combination of cryo-FIB-SEM-EDS would significantly enhance the possibility of analyzing the chemical compositions of liquid materials sporadically enclosed in the solid phase, such as fluid inclusions in metamorphic rocks, the sizes and numbers of which commonly limit the application of existing methods.…”
Section: Micro-excavation and Direct Chemical Analysis Of Individual mentioning
confidence: 99%