1984
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-198404001-00706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of Epidermal Growth Factor (Egf) Receptors(r) in the Fetal(f) Gastrointestinal Tract (Gi)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the unlikelihood of the milk-derived factors reaching, in an active form, the mucosal surface of the lower digestive tract could theoretically account for the higher binding capacities in the distal gut compared to those in the proximal gut where EGF receptors are fully exposed to milk contents and, therefore, downregulated. This-in unlikely, however, since EGF binding was actually lower in the ileum than in the more proximal portion of the small intestine (18,23). Moreover, in the fetal rabbit gastrointestinal tract, where milk factors are not implicated, a 2-to 3-fold increase in EGF binding and receptor density was, nevertheless, observed in the colon compared to that in other regions of the small intestine (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the unlikelihood of the milk-derived factors reaching, in an active form, the mucosal surface of the lower digestive tract could theoretically account for the higher binding capacities in the distal gut compared to those in the proximal gut where EGF receptors are fully exposed to milk contents and, therefore, downregulated. This-in unlikely, however, since EGF binding was actually lower in the ileum than in the more proximal portion of the small intestine (18,23). Moreover, in the fetal rabbit gastrointestinal tract, where milk factors are not implicated, a 2-to 3-fold increase in EGF binding and receptor density was, nevertheless, observed in the colon compared to that in other regions of the small intestine (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This-in unlikely, however, since EGF binding was actually lower in the ileum than in the more proximal portion of the small intestine (18,23). Moreover, in the fetal rabbit gastrointestinal tract, where milk factors are not implicated, a 2-to 3-fold increase in EGF binding and receptor density was, nevertheless, observed in the colon compared to that in other regions of the small intestine (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation