Distribution of Labour Productivity in Japan Over the Period 1996 - 2006

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in AbstractThe distribution of labour productivity is investigated by analyzing the longitudinal micro-level data set which contains detailed financial condition of large numbers of Japanese companies over the period 1996-2006. The generalized beta function of the second kind is applied to explain the distribution. We calculate marginal labour productivity by using the fitting parameters, and show that the economy in the labour market is not in equilibrium. By comparing parameters characterizing high productivity range and low productivity range, we show that inequality of low productivity range is larger than that of high productivity range. In addition, it is shown that the change of inequality in low productivity has strong correlation with GDP.Paper submitted to the special issue "Reconstructing Macroeconomics" (http://www.economics-ejournal.org/special-areas/special-issues) JEL: E23, C16, L60

Superstatistics of Labour Productivity in Manufacturing and Nonmanufacturing Sectors

“…In comparison, medium to low range sometimes shows two-peak structure, which makes it difficult to extract notable, representative features. (Elsewhere in this volume, Souma et al (2009) elaborates on this point. )…”

“…In calculating the productivity c by Eq. ( 3) from data, we calculate the value added Y by the method put forward by the Bank of Japan (Souma et al, 2009), which is the most common method used in Japan. As for the number of workers L, we use the average of the value of that year and that of the past year, as each are defined to be the value at the end of the year.…”

Aging Labor and Japanese Industry Performance: Lessons for Indonesia Policies

“…Previously, several studies on the discussion of output growth have been solely focused on the manufacturing sector (Fujiwara et al, 2009). In response to this, this study is purposely to examine the behavior of output in four different sectors-service, manufacturing, construction, and mining.…”

“…Coccia (2009) argues that the function of output can be the key to investigating the discourse about industrial production as the main determinant behind Japan's economic miracle. Notably, output is an essential factor in contributing to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (Fujiwara, Iyetomi, Ikeda, & Souma, 2009) as it enables the exaggeration of economic growth in a country.…”

Equilibrium distribution of labor productivity: a theoretical model

“…Yoshikawa [7] argues that the study of productivity dispersion provides correct micro-foundations for Keynesian economics, and that to explain distribution of productivity we should apply the method of statistical physics. In a series of papers, we have attempted to establish the empirical distribution using a large data set covering more than a million firms in the Japanese manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries [8,9,10,11]. To explain this empirically observed distribution of productivity, Iyetomi [12] introduced the notion of negative temperature.…”