2015
DOI: 10.1080/11250003.2014.1003418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of natural populations of the killifishAphanius fasciatus(Valenciennes, 1821) (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae) in Italy: past and current status, and future trends

Abstract: The census of natural populations provides relevant information for both conservation purposes and environmental monitoring. In the present work, natural populations of the killifish Aphanius fasciatus (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae) were censused in the Italian territory. The historical distribution of the species was reconstructed with the aid of bibliographic material and museal samples, in order to evaluate the extent of changes in its distribution. Three periods (pre-1990s, 1990s, post-1990s) and five habit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conservation status of A. fasciatus as LC is confirmed by our research. We are aware 153 populations of this species (Figure , Table ) which was found to have recently a positive population trend in Italy (Valdesalici et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conservation status of A. fasciatus as LC is confirmed by our research. We are aware 153 populations of this species (Figure , Table ) which was found to have recently a positive population trend in Italy (Valdesalici et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Killifish of the genus Aphanius are small fishes inhabiting fresh to hypersaline waters around the Mediterranean, the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf and the coasts of the Indian Ocean eastwards to India and southwards to Somalia. From Italy, only one species is known, A. fasciatus , which is widespread along the coasts, mostly inhabiting estuaries and coastal lagoons (Valdesalici, Langeneck, Barbieri, Castelli, & Maltagliati, ). Aphanius fasciatus is also known from Syria and Israel in the east to southern France (extirpated) and eastern Morocco in the west (Kottelat & Freyhof, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fasciatus is one of the most eurythermal and euryhaline species of the Mediterranean Sea, being able to withstand temperature changes between 4 and 40 • C and to reproduce at a salinity between 10 and 80 [20]. Despite this high capacity to adapt to extreme physical-chemical conditions, the genetic variation within-population is very small and is threatened by natural and anthropogenic pressures [25,32]; coupling this with the scarce gene flow among populations [24], the species survival can be locally compromised [33]. This situation was reported in the Maltese island, where only four populations were found in hydrologically isolated sites [34].…”
Section: Biology and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely distributed along the coasts of central Mediterranean basin; in the easternmost coasts it is scarcely abundant because A. dispar is present, even if, in some Egyptian lagoons, both species have been reported and hybrids have been observed [33]. In the westernmost areas, only A. iberus has always been recorded.…”
Section: Biology and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For several years, the only information on Iranian Aphanius was concerning their distribution, general morphology and few biological aspects (Coad & Abdoli, 2000;Coad, 2009;Esmaeili & Shiva, 2006). The recent extensive studies however improved our knowledge about different aspects of the genus Aphanius such as; their distribution (Caod, 2009;Keivany & Ghorbani, 2012;Teimori, Esmaeili, Gholami, Zarei, & Reichenbacher, 2012a;Esmaeili et al, 2014;Valdesalici, Langeneck, Barbieri, Castelli, & Maltagliati, 2015;Englezou, Gücel, & Zogaris, 2018), taxonomy (Teimori, Schulz-Mirbach, Esmaeili, & Reichenbacher, 2012b;Teimori et al, 2018), phylogenetic relationships (Hrbek, Keivany, & Coad, 2006;Esmaeili et al, 2014;Gholami, Esmaeili, Erpenbeck, & Reichenbacher, 2014;Freyhof, Weissenbacher, & Geiger, 2018;Teimori et al, ,2018 and biological properties (Esmaeili & Shiva, 2006;Bibak, Hosseini, Koohani, & Daliri, 2012;Zeinali & Motamedi, 2017;Teimori, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%