“…This autosomal recessive condition is caused by Roy et al, 1995;Chen et al, 1998;mNAIP1-6, mouse NAIP-1 through 6 (AF007769) Yaraghi et al, 1998; NAIP-rs 1 through 6, NAIP related sequence 1 (U66324), 2 (U66325), 3 (U66326), 4 (U66327), 5 (U66328), 6 (U66329) Scharf et al, 1996; rNAIP, Rat NAIP (partial cDNA) Korneluk et al, (unpublished); HIAP1, human IAP1 (U45878) Liston et al, 1996; cIAP2, cellular IAP2 (L49432) Rothe et al, 1995; MIHC, mammalian IAP homolog C (U37546) Uren et al, 1996; hITA, human inhibitor of T-cell apoptosis, Nicholl et al, 1996; MIAP1, mouse IAP1 (U88908) Liston et al, 1997;RIAP1, rat IAP1 Holcik et al, (unpublished); PIAP, porcine IAP (U79142) Stehlik et al, 1998b; ITA, inhibitor of T-cell apoptosis (U27466) Digby et al, 1996;ch-IAP1, chicken a severe loss of motor neurons which results in fatal accid paralysis (Dubowitz, 1995). While the contiguous SMN gene has been found to be causative of SMA , the tissue expression of NAIP (Xu et al, 1997a) combined with its strong in vitro (Liston et al, 1996) and in vivo (Xu et al, 1997b) neuroprotective eect make it a likely candidate for modi®cation of the SMA phenotype. It is postulated that motor neurons missing NAIP withstand the low cellular levels of SMN protein poorly and dying earlier than they would have otherwise resulting in more severe disease (MacKenzie, 1998).…”