2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of secondary particles intensities over Earth’s surface: Effect of the geomagnetic field

Abstract: We use a Corsika package (Heck et al., 1998) and an AMS-01 flight data (Alcaraz et al., 2000) to evaluate a distribution of secondary particles in the Earth atmosphere. Distribution covers all longitudes and latitudes of STS-91 Space Shuttle flight trajectory to Mir Space Station. Moreover distribution covers all depth in the atmosphere in evaluated area. We show distributions for e-, e+, μ+, μ-, gammas, hadrons and Cherenkov light from primary protons component of cosmic rays flux. Our results compare favora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exponent =  n 1.95 0.08 for muons with energies above 1 GeV is in good agreement with Grieder [36]. The function which is given to the inputs for fitting is: Considering the reported value by Bobik et al [33]: Further investigation of the simulation result shows that about half of the muons are missed in counting method as: Therefore, as we have indicated in simulation of muon angular distribution at the level of Maragheh, detected muons with zenith angles between 30°and 90°by our balanced detector are half of the total muons. According to the applied angular accuracy in our simulation, the error is less than: D m 0.01…”
Section: Simulation For Angular Distribution Of Muons On Observation ...supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exponent =  n 1.95 0.08 for muons with energies above 1 GeV is in good agreement with Grieder [36]. The function which is given to the inputs for fitting is: Considering the reported value by Bobik et al [33]: Further investigation of the simulation result shows that about half of the muons are missed in counting method as: Therefore, as we have indicated in simulation of muon angular distribution at the level of Maragheh, detected muons with zenith angles between 30°and 90°by our balanced detector are half of the total muons. According to the applied angular accuracy in our simulation, the error is less than: D m 0.01…”
Section: Simulation For Angular Distribution Of Muons On Observation ...supporting
confidence: 78%
“…To calculate the weighting factors we have used ( ) ( ) ( ) ) in ( )m sr s . In our simulation, we assumed that the collisions occur randomly on a hypothetical surface above the atmosphere with an area of 1 144 steradians as Bobik et al, was suggested [33] (i.e. particles hitting the atmosphere out of this surface do not contribute in the flux of secondary particles for the desired geographical location).…”
Section: Simulation For Angular Distribution Of Muons On Observation ...mentioning
confidence: 99%