2017
DOI: 10.1139/cjss-2017-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution of soil nutrients under and outside tree/shrub canopies on a revegetated loessial slope

Abstract: Studies of soil nutrients in revegetated land have often not provided the sampling positions on a scale of individual trees and shrubs, suggesting that nutrients were assumed to not vary substantially at fine scales. This assumption, however, conflicts with the "fertile island" theory for arid and semi-arid areas. We assessed the importance of sampling position on nutrient contents in 0-100 cm soil profiles by examining differences between soils under and outside the canopies of Armeniaca sibirica and Caragana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical patterns of the SOC, TN, and TP contents exhibited similar patterns, in which the contents decreased as the depth increased, especially below 20 cm. This result was consistent with the results of Yao, Shao, Jia, and Li (), who reported significant decreases in SOC and TN at depths of 40 and 20 cm, respectively. This is partly because of the high fine root biomass and turnover rate in the topsoil and their decreases in the subsoil (Yao et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vertical patterns of the SOC, TN, and TP contents exhibited similar patterns, in which the contents decreased as the depth increased, especially below 20 cm. This result was consistent with the results of Yao, Shao, Jia, and Li (), who reported significant decreases in SOC and TN at depths of 40 and 20 cm, respectively. This is partly because of the high fine root biomass and turnover rate in the topsoil and their decreases in the subsoil (Yao et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result was consistent with the results of Yao, Shao, Jia, and Li (), who reported significant decreases in SOC and TN at depths of 40 and 20 cm, respectively. This is partly because of the high fine root biomass and turnover rate in the topsoil and their decreases in the subsoil (Yao et al, ). When variations among planting systems along the surveyed soil profile were considered, the soil TN and TP contents differed more from each other in the topsoil than in the subsoil.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The formation of “fertile island” by tree/shrub might alter the nutrients, microbial community, and structure of the soil in vertical and horizontal directions (Waring et al, ; Yao et al, ). Our study showed that SOC, TN, TP, BD, SWC, and pH presented a strong spatial heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many studies have focused on the fine‐scale variations of soil nutrients and understory plants around single shrubs, which is important knowledge for optimal evaluations of restoration effects (Rong et al, ; Yao, Shao, Jia, & Li, ). Waring et al () indicated that individual plant have extensive and great effects on soil chemistry, especially in desert, and plantation age of shrubs increases the spatial heterogeneity of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the area of planted forest increased from 168 to 278 M ha from 1990 to 2015 at the global scale (Keenan et al, 2015). However, long-term soil nutrient availability, which is essential for sustainable timer and/or carbon emission reduction, is not fully understood (Berthrong, Pineiro, Jobbagy, & Jackson, 2012), and the altered pools and cycles resulting from afforestation can in turn affect biomass production and ecosystem function (Yao, Shao, Jia, & Li, 2017). During the last two decades, soil carbon (C) and soil nitrogen (N) have been extensively studied at different scales and major influencing factors such as climate, prior land use, plantation age, tree species, and soil texture have been studied in depth (Barcena et al, 2014;Berthrong et al, 2012;Liu, Yang, Wang, Huang, & Li, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%