2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2015.7409650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution projecting the reliability for 40 nm ReRAM and beyond based on stochastic differential equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the latter expressions for U s and U ms predict numerical values consistent with the data in the order of magnitude, [17][18][19][20][21][22]…”
Section: The Standard Fin Scenariosupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Interestingly, the latter expressions for U s and U ms predict numerical values consistent with the data in the order of magnitude, [17][18][19][20][21][22]…”
Section: The Standard Fin Scenariosupporting
confidence: 65%
“…As for endurance performance in the integrated memory array, Wei et al demonstrated highly reliable 8 Kb TaO x RRAM with endurance over 10 9 cycles using the standard 0.18 μm CMOS process . Later, Wei proposed a reliability projecting method based on stochastic differential equation and verified the method on a 2 Mbit RRAM array fabricated using 40 nm technology …”
Section: High‐speed and Scalable Rram Cells And Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…85 Later, Wei proposed a reliability projecting method based on stochastic differential equation and verified the method on a 2 Mbit RRAM array fabricated using 40 nm technology. 106…”
Section: Critical Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sketch of the typical current voltage characteristics [2][3][4][5][6] showing various domains in Table I. U is the voltage across the device different from the power source voltage V due to the series load resistor; USTOP is determined by the maximum absolute value of voltage V during the reset process.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter prediction is consistent with the data. [2][3][4][5][6] Comparing free energies in Eqs. ( 22) and ( 25) shows that the complete gap rupture is energetically more favorable when ρ c /ρ i < (E 2 /8πδµ max ) 1/2 ∼ 0.01 where we have used E ∼ 10 6 V/cm and δµ max ∼ 10 9 J/m 3 .…”
Section: Nucleation Of Insulating Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%