2017
DOI: 10.1515/auom-2017-0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributive and Dual Distributive Elements in Hyperlattices

Abstract: In this paper we introduce and study distributive elements, dual distributive elements in hyperlattices, and prove that these elements forms ∧-semi lattice and ∨-semi hyperlattice, respectively. We use the properties of prime ideals and prime filters in hyperlattices. We will proceed to introduce the notion of dual distributive hyperlattices, I-filters and filters generated by dual distributive elements. Finally, the relationship between good homomorphisms and istributive (resp. dual distributive)elements in h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What we have already said is about the definition of hyperlattice introduced by Konstantinidou and Mittas in [4] and used in [5][6][7] as well. Later some authors working on the subject, just after the Definition 1.1, they added: "Let A, B ⊆ L. Then define A ∨ B = {a ∨ b | a ∈ A, b ∈ B} and A ∧ B = {a ∧ b | a ∈ A, b ∈ B}" (see, for example [1,2]). But this, written in a wrong place (and not only), make the definition still unreadable.…”
Section: Example 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What we have already said is about the definition of hyperlattice introduced by Konstantinidou and Mittas in [4] and used in [5][6][7] as well. Later some authors working on the subject, just after the Definition 1.1, they added: "Let A, B ⊆ L. Then define A ∨ B = {a ∨ b | a ∈ A, b ∈ B} and A ∧ B = {a ∧ b | a ∈ A, b ∈ B}" (see, for example [1,2]). But this, written in a wrong place (and not only), make the definition still unreadable.…”
Section: Example 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) a ∧ a = a and a ∈ a ∨ a If in Definition 2.1 we add the property a ∈ a ∨ b ⇒ a ∧ b = b, then this definition is equivalent to Definition 1.1 but only if, for any nonempty subsets A and B of L, we define the A ∨ B and A ∧ B (there is no such a definition in [4][5][6][7]), preferable before the definition or in a correct way if it is after that (I mean, not as in [1][2]); and emphasize the fact that the element a should be identified by the singleton {a} if and when is convenient and no confusion is possible.…”
Section: Hyperlatticesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when the additive part is a hypergroup and all the other properties related to the multiplication are conserved, we talk about a general hypernear-ring [8]. The distributivity property is important also in other types of hyperstructures, see e.g., [9]. A detailed discussion about the terminology related to hypernear-rings is included in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%