2002
DOI: 10.4314/sajhe.v16i1.25269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributive justice and information communication technologies in higher education in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern still impacted on students who were less confident in terms of their computer ability and had access to fewer supportive social structures when using ICTs at university ). Broekman et al (2002) raised the dilemma that universities faced about whether to deliver online learning when many students lacked either epistemological access to working online or physical access to ICTs. This was not unique to South Africa as findings from elsewhere showed that amongst youth globally, access was concentrated in the middle/high socio-economic groups (World Bank, 2007) and that people who suffered social disadvantage were much more likely to be disengaged from ICTs than the socially advantaged (Helsper, 2008).…”
Section: Chronological Analysis Of Selected Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern still impacted on students who were less confident in terms of their computer ability and had access to fewer supportive social structures when using ICTs at university ). Broekman et al (2002) raised the dilemma that universities faced about whether to deliver online learning when many students lacked either epistemological access to working online or physical access to ICTs. This was not unique to South Africa as findings from elsewhere showed that amongst youth globally, access was concentrated in the middle/high socio-economic groups (World Bank, 2007) and that people who suffered social disadvantage were much more likely to be disengaged from ICTs than the socially advantaged (Helsper, 2008).…”
Section: Chronological Analysis Of Selected Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the challenges facing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in South Africa is the contradiction in acknowledging and progressing beyond systemic contextual problems inherited from past educational policies (Bozalek & Boughey, 2012;Leibowitz, 2012;Soudien, 2012) to attain participatory parity (Fraser, 2008(Fraser, , 2009 and preparing future generations of students for "emerging technologies" 1 (Broekman, Enslin, & Pendlebury, 2002;Veletsianos, 2010). Although these challenges are contextual, they are not unique to South Africa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surely, working with the small group of ‘digital natives’ in our context would constitute a wrongdoing in the face of the serious absences experienced by the ‘digital stranger’ group? This constitutes what fellow South African researchers call a ‘dilemma of justice’ (Broekman et al . 2002).…”
Section: Digital Apartheid: Deepening Dividesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surely, working with the small group of 'digital natives'in our context would constitute a wrongdoing in the face of the serious absences experienced by the 'digital stranger' group? This constitutes what fellow South African researchers call a 'dilemma of justice' (Broekman et al 2002). How limited resources should be prioritized, and how opportunities leveraged across the full spectrum of South Africa's students pose a unique challenge for South African educators.…”
Section: Digital Apartheid: Deepening Dividesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As numerous other authors have found (Broekman et al, 2002;Carr-Chellman & Duchastel, 2000;De Villiers & Cronje, 2005;Issroff & Hazemi, 1998;Warschauer, 1999), the initiatives described here encountered vast differences in background knowledge, experience in using computers and the internet, and access to technology. There are essentially two points of view on the accessibility issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%