2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41324-021-00412-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

District-wise estimation of Basic reproduction number (R0) for COVID-19 in India in the initial phase

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 was introduced into India by multiple sources generating local clusters and leading to the nationwide spread. A retrospective study has been conducted on the epidemiological features and spatial spread of COVID-19 in India during February 2020-March 2021. For each district, the cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases were fitted to exponential growth model for the initial phase of the outbreak (the first 7-15 days). From the estimated growth rate, epidemiological parameters like th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many countries suffered from several waves of COVID-19 with additional stress, pressure and strain on healthcare systems [4][5][6][7]. The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) for COVID-19 was estimated to be in the range of 1.4 to 2.5, [2,[8][9][10] with some studies reporting higher R 0 (e.g., >6) during outbreaks in some areas or regions of the world [11,12]. This variability in the R 0 estimates is due to several factors, including the model used for its estimation, public health interventions to control the pandemic, level of implementation of precautionary measures (e.g., travel restrictions, social distancing), and population size/density [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many countries suffered from several waves of COVID-19 with additional stress, pressure and strain on healthcare systems [4][5][6][7]. The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) for COVID-19 was estimated to be in the range of 1.4 to 2.5, [2,[8][9][10] with some studies reporting higher R 0 (e.g., >6) during outbreaks in some areas or regions of the world [11,12]. This variability in the R 0 estimates is due to several factors, including the model used for its estimation, public health interventions to control the pandemic, level of implementation of precautionary measures (e.g., travel restrictions, social distancing), and population size/density [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) for COVID-19 was estimated to be in the range of 1.4 to 2.5, [2,[8][9][10] with some studies reporting higher R 0 (e.g., >6) during outbreaks in some areas or regions of the world [11,12]. This variability in the R 0 estimates is due to several factors, including the model used for its estimation, public health interventions to control the pandemic, level of implementation of precautionary measures (e.g., travel restrictions, social distancing), and population size/density [12][13][14]. The case fatality rate (CFR) for COVID-19 ranges from 0.87% to 2.79% in different countries, with a global CFR estimate of approximately 2.07% [2,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Basic reproduction number, R 0 for the first wave was estimated by using the formula: where ρ is an exponential growth rate of the epidemic, 1/k is the mean latent (incubation) period and 1/ is the mean "onset to hospitalization" period during which the individual displays symptoms and can infect others ( Kumar et al, 2018 ; Shil et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doubling time for the outbreaks was estimated using the formula: where ρ is the epidemic growth rate ( Eqn 4 ) ( Shil et al, 2021 ; Kumar et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation