2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance feedforward control for active vibration isolation systems with internal isolator dynamics

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a discrete-time implementation of ( 6) could result in a non-causal and unstable feedforward controller due to time delays and non-minimum phase zeros in 𝐏 𝟐 . In practice, the aim is therefore to obtain the best causal and stable approximation of ( 6), see, e.g., [4,8]. For the hardmount system considered in this paper, such an approximation is derived in [16] by means of a feedforward controller using spring-damper compensation:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a discrete-time implementation of ( 6) could result in a non-causal and unstable feedforward controller due to time delays and non-minimum phase zeros in 𝐏 𝟐 . In practice, the aim is therefore to obtain the best causal and stable approximation of ( 6), see, e.g., [4,8]. For the hardmount system considered in this paper, such an approximation is derived in [16] by means of a feedforward controller using spring-damper compensation:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hard-mount suspension with disturbance feedforward control combines a low compliance to internal forces with a low transmissibility of floor vibrations [3]. Disturbance feedforward control (DFC) [4], also referred to as active vibration control [5], employs floor-mounted sensors to generate actuator forces that counteract the effect of floor vibrations. The required counter force is predicted from a model of the isolator dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the theoretical model [24][25][26][27], errors of measurement of digital vibration signals are assumed to be random and systematic.…”
Section: Covariance Model Of Vibration Signal Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control force in AVI systems is not only generated as a reaction of the relative movement between base and platform but an actuator is located between them, allowing application of an additional control force by the use of feedback or feedforward control techniques. This makes AVI systems the most suitable for many applications [2,16,18,25]. However, it is necessary to deal with some additional challenges of AVI, such as instability of the control system, real-time signal processing, the inherent isolator dynamics and the influence of the control force on the support structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%