2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disturbance of perineuronal nets in the perilesional area after photothrombosis is not associated with neuronal death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
33
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
5
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, some discordance between the two PNN markers staining has been observed previously Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011). Moreover, it appears that they can be regulated differentially in response to various stimuli, e.g., sensory deprivation (McRae et al, 2007) or ischemic stroke (Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011). It has been shown by Dino et al (2006) that, apart from aggrecan-associated, CAT-315-binding epitope is also detected on membrane-bound RPTPb (Receptor Tyrosine Phosphatase b) molecule and its soluble, PNN-associated isoform, phosphacan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, some discordance between the two PNN markers staining has been observed previously Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011). Moreover, it appears that they can be regulated differentially in response to various stimuli, e.g., sensory deprivation (McRae et al, 2007) or ischemic stroke (Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011). It has been shown by Dino et al (2006) that, apart from aggrecan-associated, CAT-315-binding epitope is also detected on membrane-bound RPTPb (Receptor Tyrosine Phosphatase b) molecule and its soluble, PNN-associated isoform, phosphacan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…According to previous studies, both WFA-and CAT-315-binding epitopes are localized on the aggrecan molecule; however, they potentially correspond to two different sugars (Matthews et al, 2002). Indeed, some discordance between the two PNN markers staining has been observed previously Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011). Moreover, it appears that they can be regulated differentially in response to various stimuli, e.g., sensory deprivation (McRae et al, 2007) or ischemic stroke (Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…PNN degradation with the bacterial enzyme Chondroitinase ABC restored synaptic plasticity in the visual cortex after the critical period (Pizzorusso et al, 2002). Although single components like Neurocan can be upregulated after damage (Kwok et al, 2011), reduction of PNNs has been described, which is in line with the fact that plasticity is increased under this condition (Karetko-Sysa et al, 2011). This shows that not only the presence of molecules as such is important, but also the spatial distribution and the interaction of different factors.…”
Section: Extracellular Signals Influence Regeneration and Stem/progenmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…At day 3 after stroke, further ongoing cell death and increase of infarct size is not likely. [20], [21] Therefore, day 3 is frequently used as a time-point to initiate neuroregenerative therapies in experimental studies. Additionally, although PT has been shown to be responsive to neuroprotectants, [22], [23] it is much less responsive than other stroke models [24], [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%