2012
DOI: 10.4181/rnc.2012.20.67402.8p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distúrbios da Consciência Humana – Parte 2 de 3

Abstract: RESUMOO presente artigo -parte 2 de 3 -apresenta uma revisão sobre a abordagem diagnóstica do enfermo em estado de coma, destacando a investigação semiológica. Geralmente, a avaliação do indivíduo cujo nível de consciência encontra-se comprometido é uma tarefa complexa, tendo em vista as dificuldades para se analisar diretamente a consciência. Portanto, sua apreciação exige a observação atenta de um conjunto de sinais clínicos fundamentados em uma cuidadosa e sistemática avaliação neurológica a partir dos segu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Glasgow coma scale (GCS), developed by Taesdale and Jennet in 1974 at The University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK, is employed worldwide to identify neurologic dysfunction and follow-up progress of level of consciousness, predict prognosis, and standardize communication among health professionals. ( 6 ) This scale became an important tool to assist patient who suffered trauma, mainly BTI victims, and, posteriorly, its use extended to other neurologic conditions that can alter consciousness. Total score ranges from 3 to 15 and it is obtained by observation of spontaneous activities and use of verbal and/or painful stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glasgow coma scale (GCS), developed by Taesdale and Jennet in 1974 at The University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK, is employed worldwide to identify neurologic dysfunction and follow-up progress of level of consciousness, predict prognosis, and standardize communication among health professionals. ( 6 ) This scale became an important tool to assist patient who suffered trauma, mainly BTI victims, and, posteriorly, its use extended to other neurologic conditions that can alter consciousness. Total score ranges from 3 to 15 and it is obtained by observation of spontaneous activities and use of verbal and/or painful stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paroxysmal sympathetic and muscular hyperactivity after TBI, first described in 1929 by Penfield, is called dysautonomia (8,9). This culminates with increased heart rate and respiration, increased temperature and blood pressure, sweating and muscle modifications such as dystonia, stiffness, spasticity and posture such as flexion of the upper limbs and extension of the lower limbs (decortication) and extension of the upper and lower limbs (decerebration) (8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Disautonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of full decision-making ability on the part of the individual -in the case, for example, of a patient in a coma 49 -it is possible to make use of advance directives of will, an instrument that guarantees the right of a person to decide in advance, both negatively or positively, about the healthcare that he or she may receive in the future. It is the expression of will, indicated in advance, based on the principle of respect for autonomy.…”
Section: In Case Of Conflict Of Interests and Of Rights The Right Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the practical reason for essentially concerning oneself with an action which can be considered moral corresponds to the virtuous character of the citizen, as well as the praxis of this agent 53,54 . Indeed, both theoretical (descriptive and understanding) and practical reason (applied) are indispensable tools of bioethics, in that the first allows assessment of the cognitive quality and logic of moral reasoning, while the second defines the moral quality of actions legitimized by such reasoning, by weighing the actual or likely consequences and by the morality of the agent 11,49 . Therefore, as theoretical bioethical tools, the rationality and reasonableness of arguments, which, being classified as rational, must be clear about the terms being used, as well as their limits and scope.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation