2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-014-0607-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diurnal, seasonal, and spatial variation of PM 2.5 in Beijing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PM 2.5/10 concentrations were significantly different among the four seasons in this study, and this finding was consistent with that in published papers on PM pollution in northern China [51,52]. Annual and seasonal average concentrations of PM had been used to investigate the effects of landscape pattern in another study [40], but the differences among seasons were quite significant.…”
Section: Scale-dependent Effects Of Greenspace Pattern On Pm Pollutionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…PM 2.5/10 concentrations were significantly different among the four seasons in this study, and this finding was consistent with that in published papers on PM pollution in northern China [51,52]. Annual and seasonal average concentrations of PM had been used to investigate the effects of landscape pattern in another study [40], but the differences among seasons were quite significant.…”
Section: Scale-dependent Effects Of Greenspace Pattern On Pm Pollutionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…PM 2.5 concentrations monitored by air quality stations were used to distinguish between unpolluted days, moderately polluted days, and heavily polluted days. As reported in previous studies, the 35 stations in Beijing are unevenly distributed across the city, and record different pollution patterns [14]; therefore, it is inadvisable to simply average the pollutants' concentrations recorded by all 35 stations, as distinct differences occur between northern and southern stations (the latter commonly have much higher pollutant concentrations than the former) [32]. Consequently, the air quality station closest to each AERONET station was selected as a reference with which to determine the air quality situation of data recorded by the AERONET stations.…”
Section: Data Selection and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to China's national ambient air quality standard release in 2012 (NAAQS-2012) [42,43], daily mean PM2.5 concentrations less than 75 µg/m 3 are classed as qualified (unpolluted); concentrations between 75 µg/m 3 and 150 µg/m 3 are classed as moderatedly polluted, while concentrations greater than 150 µg/m 3 are classed as heavily polluted [13,32]. In order to guarantee that real-time monitoring data are representative, at least 20 h of observation data are required for calculation of the daily average, considering that some data may be missing on any given day.…”
Section: Aerosol Radiative Forcing On Heavily Polluted Days Moderatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of API has stopped and new national ambient air quality standards that take into account PM 2.5 , PM 10 , O 3 , SO 2 and NO 2 have been released to replace API. Aerosol pollution (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ) is the major reason for the deterioration of the air quality in Beijing, especially during winter [36]. With the API publicized by the Ministry of Environmental Protection of People's Republic of China, the annual API declined from around 110 to 80 by the end of 2012 (the lower the API, the better the air quality) as shown in Figure 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%