1993
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diurnal Variation of Cobb Angle Measurement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has also been quantified: in adolescents, regardless of curve magnitude. The mean difference between a standing radiograph and a supine one has been quantified as 9°Cobb [23], or around 20 % [24]. In ADIS it has been shown that in severe curves (mean Cobb angle: 60 degrees) performing an x-ray at different hours of the day [25] can give a measurement error due to the worsening of the curve as the days goes by ie from the morning to the evening: this can easily be attributed to the postural collapse of the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has also been quantified: in adolescents, regardless of curve magnitude. The mean difference between a standing radiograph and a supine one has been quantified as 9°Cobb [23], or around 20 % [24]. In ADIS it has been shown that in severe curves (mean Cobb angle: 60 degrees) performing an x-ray at different hours of the day [25] can give a measurement error due to the worsening of the curve as the days goes by ie from the morning to the evening: this can easily be attributed to the postural collapse of the spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of them have analysed the reading error (on the same plate). Besides, variability connected to the procedure and to the postural changes are also to be considered [11,13,16,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the intra-observer reliability of Cobb angle measurements of radiographs is not ideal [6,20], it is the current gold standard for the measurement of the deformity, as well as the accepted instrument for clinical decisionmaking. Previous studies [2,25] have monitored diurnal variation in Cobb angle and have reported wide differences that were explained by disc shrinkage. As first stated by Risser in 1958 [21] and now widely accepted, a 10°increase in Cobb angle indicates a clinically significant change that may require a major treatment decision.…”
Section: Inter-observer Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%