2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2019.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence and flutter instabilities of a cantilever beam subjected to a terminal dynamic moment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, for c cr < 0, the mode of instability switches frequently and randomly for the entire range of γ ∈ [0.2, 0.9]. Within each band, where the mode of instability remains fixed, the critical stability curve has the shape of a catenary for both positive and negative c cr ; such catenary shapes have been reported earlier in the literature in the context of critical stability curves [12,17]. Although the catenary shape gives rise to local maxima and minima, the overall trend shows a decrease in the magnitude of c cr as the location of the measurement of curvature changes from the revolute joint end to the distal end of the beam for both positive and negative c cr .…”
Section: Critical Stability Surface and Modes Of Flutter Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, for c cr < 0, the mode of instability switches frequently and randomly for the entire range of γ ∈ [0.2, 0.9]. Within each band, where the mode of instability remains fixed, the critical stability curve has the shape of a catenary for both positive and negative c cr ; such catenary shapes have been reported earlier in the literature in the context of critical stability curves [12,17]. Although the catenary shape gives rise to local maxima and minima, the overall trend shows a decrease in the magnitude of c cr as the location of the measurement of curvature changes from the revolute joint end to the distal end of the beam for both positive and negative c cr .…”
Section: Critical Stability Surface and Modes Of Flutter Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Feedback between the state of the continuous body and its terminal end can be used to generate flutter instability [12] and earlier works [5,11] have demonstrated that flutter oscillations in a fluid environment can generate an efficient traveling waveform. The salient features of both [12] and [5,11] are exploited to generate flutter instability through feedback. Similar to [5,11], we consider a flexible beam pinned to a rigid body but a motor at the pinned joint provides the actuation forces instead of internal flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, these structural models do not only display flutter instability but, similarly to the 'Ziegler's double pendulum', also counterintuitive behaviours, often referred as 'paradoxes' [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: (A) the Counterintuitive Character Of Flutter Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many, the following ones are recalled (figure 2): Reut’s double pendulum [29], differing from the ‘Ziegler’s double pendulum’ only in the load application. More specifically, the constant magnitude load P slides along a rigid bar to maintain its application line always coincident with the undeformed state;Beck’s column [30], an elastic cantilever rod differing from the ‘Ziegler’s double pendulum’ only for the continuous and uniform distribution of mass, bending stiffness and dissipation;Pflüger’s column [31,32], which enhances the Beck’s column by considering the presence of a lumped mass at the application point of the follower load;Leipholz’s column [33,34], an elastic cantilever rod subject to a uniform distribution of follower tangential load acting along its axis;Nicolai’s column [35,36], an elastic cantilever rod with a follower twist load applied at the free end, so that three-dimensional motion is realized, instead of a planar one.Interestingly, these structural models do not only display flutter instability but, similarly to the ‘Ziegler’s double pendulum’, also counterintuitive behaviours, often referred as ‘paradoxes’ [3749].
Figure 2Discrete and continuous structural models displaying flutter instability when subject to non-conservative loads.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%