7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2002) 2002
DOI: 10.21437/icslp.2002-631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence-based out-of-class rejection for telephone handset identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the second set, we fed the utterances of all the speakers in the pseudo-impostor sets to the background model and each of the speaker models to obtain the pseudo-impostor scores corresponding to "unseen" impostor data. These pseudo-impostor scores were averaged for each utterance (see (6)). The resulting utterance-based scores were used to create a 2-center, 1-D GMM pseudo-impostor score model (Ωscore in Section 2.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the second set, we fed the utterances of all the speakers in the pseudo-impostor sets to the background model and each of the speaker models to obtain the pseudo-impostor scores corresponding to "unseen" impostor data. These pseudo-impostor scores were averaged for each utterance (see (6)). The resulting utterance-based scores were used to create a 2-center, 1-D GMM pseudo-impostor score model (Ωscore in Section 2.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there were handset and coder mismatches between the speaker models and the verification utterances. We used stochastic feature transformation with handset identification [5] [6] to compensate the mismatches. We assume that a claimant will be asked to utter two sentences during a verification session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have adopted our recently proposed handset selector [4], [7] to identify the most likely handset given an utterance. Specifically, H GMMs, {Γ k } H k=1 , as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Handset Selectormentioning
confidence: 99%