1993
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330900308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence between biochemical and cytogenetic differences in three species of the Callicebus moloch group

Abstract: Specimens from three species of the Callicebus moloch group--C. moloch (N = 80), C. brunneus (N = 166), and C. cupreus (N = 23)--were studied. Twenty genetic loci were investigated through electrophoresis, genetic distances were estimated, and the results compared with the available cytogenetic data. Low values of genetic distance were encountered, contrasting with relatively large chromosome differences. We propose that recent karyotypic rearrangements, rather than other Pleistocene events, were the major evo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since chromosomal rearrangements are considered an important factor for speciation in Callicebus [Schneider et al, 1993;Rodrigues et al, 2001Rodrigues et al, , 2004Dumas et al, 2005], we assume that these samples represent distinct species, and designate them herein as CPA-1 [Stanyon et al, 2000;Dumas et al, 2005] and CPA-2 [Barros et al, 2003]. We further suggest that CPA-2 could be a representative of the moloch group, due to the high degree of Gbanding similarity with C. hoffmannsi [Rodrigues et al, 2000].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since chromosomal rearrangements are considered an important factor for speciation in Callicebus [Schneider et al, 1993;Rodrigues et al, 2001Rodrigues et al, , 2004Dumas et al, 2005], we assume that these samples represent distinct species, and designate them herein as CPA-1 [Stanyon et al, 2000;Dumas et al, 2005] and CPA-2 [Barros et al, 2003]. We further suggest that CPA-2 could be a representative of the moloch group, due to the high degree of Gbanding similarity with C. hoffmannsi [Rodrigues et al, 2000].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…cupreus families were housed at the California Regional Primate Research Center at the University of California, Davis, according to standard laboratory protocol, as described in Hoffman, Mendoza, Hennessy, and Mason (1995). C. cupreus was previously considered synonymous with Callicebus moloch (Hershkovitz, 1963) but was recognized as a separate species by Hershkovitz (1990), Schneider et al (1993), Kobayashi (1995), and Groves (1993Groves ( , 2001. Previous research (e.g., Hoffman et al, 1995;Mendoza & Mason, 1986) using the animals from this colony has identified these titi monkeys as C. moloch on the basis of the taxonomy that existed at the time that the colony was established from wild stock.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting contrast arises from studies investigating divergence between biochemical and cytogenetic di¡erences in the Callicebus moloch group (C. moloch, C. brunneus, C. cupreus) showing the presence of low values of genetic distance (Schneider et al 1993). These authors also suggest that recent karyological rearrangements are possibly the major evolutionary mechanism at the origin of the speciation process in this group of Primates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%