2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divergence between informant and archival measures of the environment: Real differences, artifact, or perceptual error?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complexity refers to the heterogeneity and range of an organization's activities; dynamism refers to unpredictable change in environmental conditions faced by an organization; and munificence is the extent to which an environment supports growth of organizations within it, and is often measured on a reverse scale to environmental hostility (Ward et al, 1995). As for perceptions, researchers use either objective or subjective measurement methods of the environment (Bourgeois, 1980;Boyd et al, 1993;Doty et al, 2006).…”
Section: Organizational Environment Resource Dependence Theory and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complexity refers to the heterogeneity and range of an organization's activities; dynamism refers to unpredictable change in environmental conditions faced by an organization; and munificence is the extent to which an environment supports growth of organizations within it, and is often measured on a reverse scale to environmental hostility (Ward et al, 1995). As for perceptions, researchers use either objective or subjective measurement methods of the environment (Bourgeois, 1980;Boyd et al, 1993;Doty et al, 2006).…”
Section: Organizational Environment Resource Dependence Theory and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are real differences between objective and perceived conditions, which are likely due to what is noticed and how these conditions are interpreted (Doty et al, 2006). Indeed, perceptions may be more relevant to understanding strategy and ultimately performance than the actual facts of the situation.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be additional ways in which situational and environmental perceptions are interwoven. Studies on organizational factors have posited that firm strategy and structure influence the focus of attention (Ocasio, 1997) and interpretations of the environment (Doty et al, 2006;Sutcliffe, 1994;Sutcliffe and Huber, 1998). There may indeed be recursive effects with organizational factors influencing entrepreneurial perceptions -and entrepreneurial perceptions, in turn, shaping organizational design.…”
Section: Opportunities For Future Research and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrently, leaders tend to act on a perceived environment (Boyd et al 1993) with the goal of achieving a desired adaptation (Davis and Meyer 1998;Hambrick 1981). Task leaders must also know that environmental variation relates to changes that may occur independent of a leader's ability to notice, comprehend, or interpret environment related data (Doty et al 2006). Regardless, organizations tuned into their environment are more likely to succeed because they are able to respond 'predictively' through meaningful action and contingencies to a wide range of signals (Slaughter 1999).…”
Section: Task Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%