“…Unlike field dependent subjects (FDs), field independent individuals (FIs) usually show less difficulty in separating information from the surrounding context [ 23 ] and are generally more focused on relevant information, inhibiting attention to irrelevant information coming from the environment [ 24 ]. Although FIs are generally defined as more flexible, open-minded, and capable of breaking down the routine than FDs, empirical evidence on the role of FDI on creativity provided unclear results [ 21 ], probably because of the involvement of specific cognitive processes (e.g., fluid intelligence, inhibition, working memory, and flexibility [ 25 , 26 ]), socio-cultural factors (e.g., Western vs. Eastern [ 27 ]), as well as the discrepancy between the scoring methods (e.g., empirically-based and rater-based scoring methods [ 28 ]), tasks used (e.g., divergent and convergent tasks, real-world creative production tasks [ 29 ]), and sampling bias. For a systematic review on the role of FDI in creativity, see Giancola et al [ 30 ].…”