“…Third, based on our data, combined practices, crop rotation, embedding natural habitat, and agroforestry, each lead to significantly higher profits in terms of net income, or benefit-cost ratio in the case of agroforestry. Previous reviews have similarly suggested that crop rotation usually results in higher income and fewer production risks, particularly for low-income smallholder farmers (Feliciano, 2019;Shah et al, 2021). However, the adoption of diversified rotation systems may be negatively influenced by the higher investment (e.g., inputs, machinery, labour) needed to integrate and manage extra crops compared to simpler rotations (Feliciano, 2019), which may explain the higher costs for crop rotations found in our study.…”