2008
DOI: 10.1080/09670870701523074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity and comparative phenology of Lepidoptera on Bt and non-Bt maize in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although H. armigera is a non‐target species for Bt maize in South Africa this species is adversely affected by Bt maize. Van Wyk et al. (2008) observed that at field level, the incidence of damage caused by H. armigera was always significantly lower on Bt maize than on non‐Bt maize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although H. armigera is a non‐target species for Bt maize in South Africa this species is adversely affected by Bt maize. Van Wyk et al. (2008) observed that at field level, the incidence of damage caused by H. armigera was always significantly lower on Bt maize than on non‐Bt maize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moths possibly prefer irrigated maize, which could have contributed to increased selection pressure toward the evolution of resistance to the Bt toxin (Van Rensburg 2007). Van Wyk et al (2008) also indicated that the strong linkage of stem borers to the maize ecosystem in irrigated areas and especially the planting of Bt maize in these systems results in strong selection pressure for evolution of resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Due to their sensitivity for low humidity (Van Rensburg et al, 1988), it is highly likely that B. fusca moths give preference to irrigated fields which could result in an additional component adding selection pressure on the borer population. Van Wyk et al (2008) indicated that the strong association of stem borers to the maize ecosystem in many areas in South Africa, and planting of Bt-maize in these systems resulted in strong selection pressure for evolution of resistance. The reliance of B. fusca on maize is strong since no wild hosts are present, and in areas where adoption rates are high, no unstructured refugia are present in the form of large non-Bt maize fields.…”
Section: Other Complicating and Contributing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These infestation levels are typical of those observed in non-GM maize fields prior to introduction of Bt maize in South Africa and were often higher than the recommended economic threshold value (10%) for chemical control(Van Rensburg et al, 1988). The general tendency observed in these field surveys was a sharp increase in the number of damaged plants and in some instances the presence of larvae on plants from the flowering period onwards(Van Wyk et al, 2008).Van was the first to officially report field resistance of B. fusca to Bt maize, with field collected larvae in the 2005/06 crop growing season. Laboratory studies showed that significant numbers of the F1-generation diapause larvae collected on Bt maize in the Christiana area in the Northern Cape province survived on Bt maize.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%