In 1986, a small group of public policy faculty gathered at Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, for a conference on what was then a novel enterprise in professional education for public service. The enterprise grew into the dozens of masters programs in policy analysis and management that now cover not only the United States but the globe, and on the 20th anniversary of that influential meeting, APPAM organized a conference at Park City, Utah, where a much larger group of faculty gathered to reflect backwards on how policy analysis education had evolved, and forwards on where it should be going.The Park City conference was organized around a set of commissioned papers, each providing a starting point and common ground for discussion sessions that were in turn recorded by rapporteurs. Rapporteurs were asked to write essays capturing the most important themes of their sessions, not to merely transcribe the conversation, and they did so admirably.The Curriculum and Case Notes section of JPAM will publish, over the next few issues, a selection of the papers and discussion reports, beginning here with a historic overview provided in the opening plenary address by John Ellwood, and a look at the newest development in policy education, namely, the growth of such programs outside the United States, from a group of authors in this international context. The latter paper is followed by Scott Fritzen's report on the discussion in that session.
MICHAEL O'HARE, Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy University of California, Berkeley.
David Reingold Editor
Curriculum and Case Notes
CHALLENGES TO PUBLIC POLICY AND PUBLIC MANAGEMENT EDUCATION John W. EllwoodThis paper has two main goals: to provide an overview of APPAM programs, especially master's programs; and to provide a series of hypotheses and challenges as starting points for the more in-depth discussions that will take place over the next few days. Over two decades ago, I assisted Don Stokes in a project that sought to explore innovations in graduate education for public service. One of my duties in that effort was to produce a description (or in Don Stokes' words, a morphology) of the field. In so doing, I was given access to the first round of the self-studies that were part of the National Association of Schools of Public Administration and Analysis (NASPAA) budding accreditation process. 1 The essay provides a fairly good baseline of what the world looked like in 1985 and as such should help any discussion of things that have changed and things that have remained fairly constant in our business.If I have a qualification for achieving the second goal, it is that I have spent the last decade and a half teaching in one of the "original" policy programs-the Goldman School of Public Policy at Berkeley. I believe that one of the assumptions that has driven this conference is that we have seen a convergence between the pure public policy program and the various schools and departments of public administration and/or affairs-with the public policy programs incor...