2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities at each step of treatment plant for potable water generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
92
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
10
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A dominant fraction of the sand filter bacterial community belonged to the Proteobacteria (a-, b-, and c-Proteobacteria), Nitrospira, and Acidobacteria. These phyla have also been found to account for significant fractions of microbial communities from sand filters of full scale drinking water treatment plants (Pinto et al, 2012;White et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A dominant fraction of the sand filter bacterial community belonged to the Proteobacteria (a-, b-, and c-Proteobacteria), Nitrospira, and Acidobacteria. These phyla have also been found to account for significant fractions of microbial communities from sand filters of full scale drinking water treatment plants (Pinto et al, 2012;White et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2013;Lin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbial community in the filtered water was very similar to the microbial community of the groundwater which might be due to the high flow rate (2.6 L min À1 ) and short residence time (<30 min) of the groundwater in the sand filter (Voegelin et al, 2014) limiting the exchange and transition between planktonic and surface associated microbial populations. Recent studies on biologically active sand filters have shown that sand filter microbial biofilms are stable and resistant to perturbations and fluctuations in the source water community (Pinto et al, 2012;Lin et al, 2014). However, other engineered microbial communities have been shown to be more dynamic, quickly responding to alterations in the chemical and biological source water composition (Kaewpipat and Grady, 2002;Moons et al, 2009).…”
Section: Sand Filter Colonizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† At the phylum level, both were dominated by proteobacteria (>77%), which are commonly found in freshwater lake studies, 49 as well as in other drinking water systems. 14,15,[50][51][52] This phylum has also been shown to be stable and less influenced by water treatment processes and seasonal changes, thereby allowing it to persist in drinking water filters. 53 Among the proteobacteria, betaproteobacteria (almost entirely Burkholderiales) dominated both filters, but alphaproteobacteria were also abundant in the GAC, which is consistent with Lautenschlager et al (2014).…”
Section: Microbial Taxonomic Profile Of the Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these techniques provide for important screening tools for recent fecal contamination, the majority of microorganisms present in the environment are not culturable and methods such as high throughput sequencing are required to characterize unculturable bacteria in water supplies (Eichler et al, 2006;Revetta et al, 2010;Lin et al, 2014;Gomez-Alvarez et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%