2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity and genome mapping assessment of disordered and functional domains in trypanosomatids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 138 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TriTrypDB's and Swiss-Prot's annotations of protein sequences comprising our reference data set revealed pseudogenic and intergenic CDS counterparts of numerous known multigenic families in trypanosomatids ( Avelar et al 2020 ) and several other protein classes. However, most pseudogenes and intergenic CDSs identified remain unclassified as their most similar proteins in the reference group are annotated as hypothetical , unspecified , putative , pseudogene , or pseudogenic —Lm (1,074/95.8%), Tb (2,074/98.1%), and Tc (4,828/91.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TriTrypDB's and Swiss-Prot's annotations of protein sequences comprising our reference data set revealed pseudogenic and intergenic CDS counterparts of numerous known multigenic families in trypanosomatids ( Avelar et al 2020 ) and several other protein classes. However, most pseudogenes and intergenic CDSs identified remain unclassified as their most similar proteins in the reference group are annotated as hypothetical , unspecified , putative , pseudogene , or pseudogenic —Lm (1,074/95.8%), Tb (2,074/98.1%), and Tc (4,828/91.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%