2016
DOI: 10.1108/lodj-10-2014-0201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diversity in leadership: race in leader-member exchanges

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These behaviors collectively revealed detrimental outcomes such as turnover, barriers to advancement, and negative emotions for the targets. Thus, while this study contributes to the conceptualization of selective incivility among targets and instigators with a shared social identity, the CBS framework can be useful for understanding other instances where individuals behave counter to group norms, values, and expectations with individuals of a shared identify, such as a lack of support from a supervisor (e.g., Paustian-Underdahl et al, 2017), greater relationship conflict with a subordinate (e.g., Miller et al, 2018), and lower leader–member exchange between a supervisor and subordinate (e.g., Randolph-Seng et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These behaviors collectively revealed detrimental outcomes such as turnover, barriers to advancement, and negative emotions for the targets. Thus, while this study contributes to the conceptualization of selective incivility among targets and instigators with a shared social identity, the CBS framework can be useful for understanding other instances where individuals behave counter to group norms, values, and expectations with individuals of a shared identify, such as a lack of support from a supervisor (e.g., Paustian-Underdahl et al, 2017), greater relationship conflict with a subordinate (e.g., Miller et al, 2018), and lower leader–member exchange between a supervisor and subordinate (e.g., Randolph-Seng et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persisting disparities in corporate, political, and higher education environments suggest that prototypical leadership models are inadequate (Chin & Trimble, 2014). Consideration of relational and contingency theories of leadership as they relate to dimensions of identity illuminates how leader-follower relationships and the appropriateness of leader behaviors may be affected by race, and gender (Eagly & Chin, 2010;Randolph-Seng et al, 2016). According to Naylor et al (2015), the underrepresentation of Black males in higher education is a problem of access, affordability, and attainment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic similarity and dissimilarity among leader-followers have been found to have significant effects on how leaders look upon their followers, how leaders distinguish their roles in the organisation and how organisational members interact among each another (Randolph-Seng et al, 2016). Social identity theory (Tajfel and Turner, 1986) provides a conceptual basis in examining whether demographic similarity and dissimilarity are associated with reaction to negative feedback.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been identified that both cultural differences and similarities can explain behaviours (Church et al , 2010). Based on the similarity–attraction paradigm, members of a leader–follower dyad who share similar demographic characteristics are likely to have a more positive relationship (Randolph-Seng et al , 2016). This is because individuals who are demographically similar often believe they are similar, in spite of the differences in values, beliefs and expectations (Duffy and Ferrier, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%