Italy's Divided Memory 2009
DOI: 10.1057/9780230101838_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divided Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…10 From the 2000s onwards, "Fossoli" occurred also with words like "Basovizza" or "foibe," activating a different set of historical knowledgethe history of communist regimes in East Europe and human rights violationsand connecting it with Fossoli. This new co-text, linked to the new commemorative circumstance, is explained by a change in politics of memory and also by a conflict over memory (Foot 2009). In fact, a right-wing government instituted the Memorial Day for the foibe in 2004, with an anti-communist aim, namely to contrast the memory of the Resistance, in which the symbolic legacy of communist militants is particularly important.…”
Section: Contextual and Circumstantial Selections: Commemorative Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 From the 2000s onwards, "Fossoli" occurred also with words like "Basovizza" or "foibe," activating a different set of historical knowledgethe history of communist regimes in East Europe and human rights violationsand connecting it with Fossoli. This new co-text, linked to the new commemorative circumstance, is explained by a change in politics of memory and also by a conflict over memory (Foot 2009). In fact, a right-wing government instituted the Memorial Day for the foibe in 2004, with an anti-communist aim, namely to contrast the memory of the Resistance, in which the symbolic legacy of communist militants is particularly important.…”
Section: Contextual and Circumstantial Selections: Commemorative Datementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Perlasca's reputation emerged from the activity of witnesses (as first level reputational entrepreneurs) and Yad Vashem as a positive, rather than as divided or subcultural, reputation. This was a crucial aspect for the importance of Perlasca's figure in a new context – Italy – where he could have been perceived as more difficult to remember, given the fact that the relevant cleavages in Italian memory were different from those in Israeli society, especially with regards to the left‐right distinction and the role of religious discourse in public life, all factors that contribute to Italy's “divided memory” (Foot, ). A positive reputation tout court usually silences possible objections, especially when it is framed not in political terms but, rather, as an example of universal values.…”
Section: Phase 2: Recognition and Honourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, Italy has been regarded as an exemplar case of divided memory where, as historian John Foot (2009) argues, “it has proved extremely difficult, if not impossible, for any group—public or private—to create a consensus around the past, or around ways of remembering the past” (p. 1). Problematic memories, first of all the memory of fascism and the memory of the Resistance against fascism, were first sidelined and have since erupted in the public arena, adding a dimension of symbolic conflict to an endemic climate of political polarization that was exacerbated during the 1990s.…”
Section: Italy and The Reconfiguration Of Republican Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%