2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.0c00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divided Perception of Drinking Water Safety: Another Manifestation of America’s Racial Gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of US states do not have CWS service boundaries publicly available, and the limitations of available water quality data are well known [32]. Understanding potential relationships between demographics and home water quality is an urgent need: a recent national survey indicated that the majority of Black Americans do not believe their drinking water is safe to consume [36]. In this study, the demonstration of significant statistical differences based on demographics even given limitations that potentially do not account for intentional exclusion from service is quite notable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of US states do not have CWS service boundaries publicly available, and the limitations of available water quality data are well known [32]. Understanding potential relationships between demographics and home water quality is an urgent need: a recent national survey indicated that the majority of Black Americans do not believe their drinking water is safe to consume [36]. In this study, the demonstration of significant statistical differences based on demographics even given limitations that potentially do not account for intentional exclusion from service is quite notable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in countries with more than 95% basic drinking water service coverage, there was considerable diversity in anticipated harm, supporting the notion that perceived risks are strongly in uenced by factors other than objective water quality 20 . These data suggest that addressing the global water crisis will require targeted interventions that address inequalities in access to safe drinking water and promote greater trust through improvements in water governance, knowledge dissemination, and relationship building [36][37][38] . For example, we found inequalities across country income levels and sociodemographic characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standards for astronauts are high 64 , but the same has not always been true of the standards for ordinary civilians on Earth, especially those in disenfranchised communities. This history of scientist-led discrimination has led to a mistrust of science and engineering within these communities 65,66 . Technology is crucial for addressing climate change, but it must be safe, effective and equitably distributed.…”
Section: Societal Benefits Of Sbementioning
confidence: 99%