2016
DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2016.1196882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dividend payouts and company ownership structure amid the global financial crisis: evidence from Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Ankudinov and Lebedev (2016) and Setiawan et al (2016), ownership structure is here implemented as binary variables, such that if family owners represent over 20 percent of firm ownership, firms are categorized as 1, otherwise zero. Moreover, if the state owns over 20 percent of the firm, it is categorized as 1, otherwise zero.…”
Section: Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Ankudinov and Lebedev (2016) and Setiawan et al (2016), ownership structure is here implemented as binary variables, such that if family owners represent over 20 percent of firm ownership, firms are categorized as 1, otherwise zero. Moreover, if the state owns over 20 percent of the firm, it is categorized as 1, otherwise zero.…”
Section: Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Liljeblom and Maury () find that between 1998 to 2003 state‐controlled firms paid more frequent dividends than private firms. Similarly, Ankudinov and Lebedev () find that, though state firms tended to pay fewer dividends during the financial crisis than private firms, public firms in the preceding period typically payed more frequent dividends. More interestingly, the authors argue that their results are consistent with the view that the interests of the state as a stakeholder took precedence over its interests as a shareholder.…”
Section: The Traditional Determinants Of Dividend Policymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For them, the speed of adjustment in the companies' dividend payout policy increases after the crisis, above pre-crisis levels, indicating a greater concentration on investments and cash reserves. Ankudinov and Lebedev (2016) find that, after the referred crisis, the companies that most reduce their dividend payout are those with the highest leverage level, the greatest investment opportunities and cash restriction or low liquidity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%