2013
DOI: 10.1163/15697312-12341274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divine Hiddenness and Human Sin: The Noetic Effect of Sin

Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between human sin and divine hiddenness, drawing on views that are widely acknowledged within the Reformed tradition. It argues, first, that according to these views there is no inculpable nonbelief, and thus, second, that a crucial premise in the atheistic argument from divine hiddenness is untenable. The overarching question here is: If there is a sensus divinitatis, is it possible to be an inculpable nonbeliever? To answer this question, the cognitive effects of sin on o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussions of 4 prevalent early on in the discussion of the hiddenness argument tended to be onesidedly influenced by Calvinist ideas of sinfulness and ignored the nonbelief of vast ages prior to the development of theistic religion. Here and there, one still finds this sort of opposition to the existence of nonresistant nonbelief (e.g., Azadegan, ). But recent work on the subject has generally been quite different, with appeals to cognitive psychology and social epistemology replacing unquestioned religious doctrine.…”
Section: New Discussion Of Nonresistant Nonbeliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions of 4 prevalent early on in the discussion of the hiddenness argument tended to be onesidedly influenced by Calvinist ideas of sinfulness and ignored the nonbelief of vast ages prior to the development of theistic religion. Here and there, one still finds this sort of opposition to the existence of nonresistant nonbelief (e.g., Azadegan, ). But recent work on the subject has generally been quite different, with appeals to cognitive psychology and social epistemology replacing unquestioned religious doctrine.…”
Section: New Discussion Of Nonresistant Nonbeliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Wojtyla takes the idea of sin as an impediment to recognizing God's reality as a fundamental assumption, one may question its plausibility. However, some thinkers have already developed this idea into various full-fledged arguments against the problem (Moser 2002;Lehe 2004;Azadegan 2013).…”
Section: The Wojtylian Response To Divine Hiddennessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.See Aijaz & Weidler (2007), Azadegan (2013a; 2013b; forthcoming), Cullison (2010), Cuneo (2013), Dumsday (2010a; 2010b; 2012a; 2012b; 2013), Evans (2006; 2010), Henry (2001; 2008), Howard-Snyder (1996), King (2008; 2013), Marsh (2008), McBrayer & Swenson (2012), McCreary (2010), McKim (2001), Moser (2008), Murray (2002), Oakes (2008), O'Connell (2013), Poston & Dougherty (2007), Rea (2009), Swinburne (1998; 2004), van Inwagen (2002; 2006), Tucker (2008), and Weidler & Aijaz (2013). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%